地球自转参数预报误差对天文测量影响的分析

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2023.0240

测绘通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 102-107,125.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2023.0240

地球自转参数预报误差对天文测量影响的分析

魏飞^1,2,3, 高玉平^1,3, 尹东山^1,3

1. 中国科学院国家授时中心, 陕西西安 710600;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 中国科学院时间频率基准重点试验室, 陕西西安 710600

收稿日期:2022-09-29 发布日期:2023-09-01
作者简介:魏飞(1991-),男,博士生,研究方向为世界时测量与服务,地球自转、天文测量。E-mail:1013709546@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(11973046；41804034)

Analysis of astronomical measurement considering effects of earth roration parameter prediction error

WEI Fei^1,2,3, GAO Yuping^1,3, YIN Dongshan^1,3

1. National Time Service Center, Chinese Academy of Science, Xi'an 710600, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Time and Frequency Primary Standards, Chinese Academy of Science, Xi'an 710600, China

Received:2022-09-29 Published:2023-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于地球自转参数(ERP)的滞后性,目前主要使用国际地球自转和参考服务IERS发布的Bulletin A(简称A公报)预报值进行解算,ERP预报误差对于天文测量的影响目前缺少系统的研究。为此,本文选取IERS 2015-2021 近7年A公报的ERP参数对其长期预报及不同时间跨度预报误差分析,并以某站数字天顶望远镜观测结果为例,分析了ERP预报误差对于天文测量的影响。结果表明,随着时间的增加,预报精度越来越差,对于极移参数,1年跨度的预报误差值达到了0.021 as,预报误差对天文经、纬度及方位角的影响分别为0.045 as、0.041 as和0.042 as,完全满足一等天文测量的精度要求;而UT1-UTC预报精度是限制A公报精度的主要因素,60天UT1-UTC的预报误差值已达到了0.007 s,对天文经度的影响达到了0.379 as,已超出一等天文测量的精度要求。为了满足一等天文测量的要求,选取UT1-UTC预报值时,其时间跨度最大为40 d。

关键词: 天文测量, 地球自转参数, 预报误差, 极移, UT1-UTC

Abstract: Due to the hysteresis of earth rotation parameters (ERP), currently only the forecast values of Bulletin A (referred to as Bulletin A) provided by the IERS are used for calculation, however, the effect of ERP forecast errors on astronomical measurement is currently lacking systematic research.To this end, this paper selects the forecast errors of IERS 2015-2021 Bulletin A in the past 7 years to analyze its long-term forecast and forecast errors in different time spans, and takes the observation results of digital zenith telescope at a station as an example to analyze the effect of the Bulletin A forecast error on astronomical measurement. It shows that with the increase of time, the forecast accuracy is getting worse and worse. The forecast error for one-year span of the polar shift reaches 0.021 4 as, The effect of polar shift prediction error on astronomical longitude、latitude and astronomical azimuth is 0.045 as、0.041 as and 0.042 as, which fully meets the accuracy requirements of first-class astronomical measurements.The UT1-UTC prediction accuracy is the major factor limiting the accuracy of the Bulletin A. The prediction error of UT1-UTC in a 60-day span reaches 0.007 s, and the effect on astronomical longitude reaches 0.379 as, which has exceeded the accuracy requirements of first-class astronomical measurements.In order to meet the requirements of first-class astronomical measurements, when the UT1-UTC predicted value is selected, the maximum time span is 40 d.

Key words: astronomical measurements, earth rotation parameters, forecast error, pole shift, UT1-UTC

中图分类号:

P222

魏飞, 高玉平, 尹东山. 地球自转参数预报误差对天文测量影响的分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(8): 102-107,125.

WEI Fei, GAO Yuping, YIN Dongshan. Analysis of astronomical measurement considering effects of earth roration parameter prediction error[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2023, 0(8): 102-107,125.

参考文献

[1] 王若璞,张超.天文测量原理与方法[M].郑州:信息工程大学,2016:2-4.
[2] 孔祥元, 郭际明, 刘宗泉. 大地测量学基础[M]. 2版. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2010.
[3] 张赤军. 天文(重力)水准的新手段及其计算方法[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2002, 22(4):31-34.
[4] 连月勇, 张超, 谢宗特. 地球定向参数对天文定位定向的影响分析[J]. 导航定位学报, 2015, 3(1):41-45.
[5] 郭金运, 金鑫, 边少锋, 等. 垂线偏差测量的固体潮和海潮改正[J].测绘学报,2022,51(7):1215-1224.
[6] 王博. 数字化天顶望远镜观测图像及数据处理方法研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学, 2014.
[7] 杨冯莲, 张胜军, 李航, 等. 大地测量与测高资料的垂线偏差解算与分析[J]. 测绘科学, 2020, 45(7):70-74.
[8] 陈少杰.基于DZT的ERP自主测量与服务技术研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2022.
[9] 陈少杰, 高玉平, 时春霖, 等. 地球定向参数测量发展现状和展望[J]. 全球定位系统, 2021, 46(5):111-116.
[10] KOSEK W. Future improvements in EOP prediction[M]//Geodesy for Planet Earth. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011:513-520.
[11] LIEBE C C. Star trackers for attitude determination[J]. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 1995, 10(6):10-16.
[12] RAY J R, CARTER W E, ROBERTSON D S. Assessment of the accuracy of daily UT1 determinations by very long baseline interferometry[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 1995, 100(B5):8193-8200.
[13] 陈少杰, 高玉平, 时春霖, 等. 中国DZT网ERP测量系统站网分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(5):13-19.
[14] 陈少杰, 高玉平, 时春霖, 等. 顾及A公报影响的天文测量精度分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2021, 56(2)331-338.
[15] PETIT G,LUZUM B. IERS conventions (2010).IERS technical note 36[DB/OL].[2020-01-20].http://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/Publications/TechnicalNotes/tn.36.html/.
[16] LAMBERT S, BIZOUARD C. Positioning the terrestrial ephemeris origin in the international terrestrial reference frame[J]. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2002, 394(1):317-321.
[17] CAPITAINE N, GUINOT B, MCCARTHY D. Definition of the celestial ephemeris origin and of UT1 in the international celestial reference frame[J].Astronomy & Astrophysics,2000,355:398-405.
[18] KOSEK W, KALARUS M, JOHNSON T J,et al. A Comparison of LOD an UT1-UTC forecasts by different combined prediction techniques[J].Artifical Satellites:a Journal of Planetary Geodesy,2005,40(2):119-125.

地球自转参数预报误差对天文测量影响的分析

Analysis of astronomical measurement considering effects of earth roration parameter prediction error

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张耿, 张超, 米科峰, 詹银虎, 李崇辉. 一种改进的一维最大熵星图分割算法[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(10): 53-57.
[2]	韩恒星, 党亚民, 许长辉. 地球自转参数的RFFLS短期预报算法研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2017, 0(9): 15-18.
[3]	韩恒星, 党亚民, 许长辉, 王虎, 谷守周, 张龙平. 地球自转参数的LS+AR超短期预报方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2017, 0(7): 1-4.
[4]	罗佳. 岁差和章动的教学研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2013, 0(6): 102-103.
[5]	徐爱功赵亮周阳. 基于PANDA软件的GPS静态精密单点定位精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2013, 0(10): 5-7.