Comparison of GNSS Data Quality Check Tool TEQC and SpiderQC

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2018.0195

测绘通报 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 148-152.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2018.0195

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison of GNSS Data Quality Check Tool TEQC and SpiderQC

WANG Kaifeng, WANG Yong

Jiangsu Province Surveying & Mapping Engineering Institute, Nanjing 210013, China

Received:2018-04-03 Online:2018-06-25 Published:2018-07-07

Abstract

Abstract: In the operation and maintenance of JSCORS,a large number of GNSS data quality inspections are involved.This article describes some statistical indicators of Jiangsu CORS in the process of data quality inspection,as well as the tools TEQC and Leica SpiderQC used to implement these quality checks.Through comparison and demonstration of the features of the two softwares,they provide reference for the selection of tools in similar work.

Key words: GNSS, data quality, TEQC, SpiderQC

CLC Number:

P23

WANG Kaifeng, WANG Yong. Comparison of GNSS Data Quality Check Tool TEQC and SpiderQC[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(6): 148-152.

[1]	ZHANG Bo, LIU Qiang, XU Guoliang, CAI Renlan, CHENG Feng. Application of GNSS+INS integrated navigation in mine auto-driving trucks [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(7): 143-147.
[2]	XIONG Chunbao, PANG Hongxing, WANG Meng, SHI Qingfa. Application of multi-filter algorithm based on ICEEMDAN in dynamic deformation monitoring of super high-rise structures [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(3): 152-156.
[3]	ZHANG Yi, ZHOU Li. Study on inversion model of significant wave height from shore-based GNSS-IR by using NARX recurrent neural network [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(2): 90-94.
[4]	JIANG Junyi, GAO Xingguo, QU Meng, MA Chao. Stability evaluation of ship hull in anchoring state based on GNSS attitude determination [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(2): 140-144.
[5]	ZHANG Shifang, ZHANG Jin. Application of Kalman filter in GNSS monitoring of ground subsidence in Xishan coalfield of Shanxi province [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(9): 103-107.
[6]	WANG Yanli, GAO Kaichao, LIU Baoqiang, ZHOU Congwei. Construction and application of distribution cable mobile GIS system supported by GNSS [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(8): 150-153.
[7]	YANG Guochuang, DUAN Chunlei. Joint InSAR and GNSS to monitor land subsidence in coastal areas [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(6): 76-82.
[8]	DUAN Wei, WANG Min, WU Hao, LIU Chao. Recognition and early warning of deformation information in GNSS coordinate series based on the LWR-Pettitt method [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(5): 124-128,154.
[9]	SHI Lingfan, WANG Ping, HUANG Liangke. Construction on atmospheric weighted mean temperature model over the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(4): 52-59.
[10]	REN Gaosheng, LI Mingfeng, CHEN Ningning, ZHANG Shiquan. River surveying based on UAV PPK technology and precision analysis [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(3): 100-104.
[11]	FENG Zhiqiang, ZHANG Yaodong, HU Danhui, ZHOU Guangyuan, LI Zhaohui, ZHOU Xueming, MAO Xiaopo. Influence analysis of transmission line electromagnetic interference on BDS data quality and accuracy [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(10): 94-97,113.
[12]	WANG Shitai, YANG Shini, LI Xuezhen. Analysis of GNSS positioning accuracy of single and dual frequency smart phone [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(1): 18-23.
[13]	CHEN Kun, SHEN Fei, CAO Xinyun, ZHU Yifan. Retrieving GNSS-IR soil moisture based on deep belief network [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 0(9): 100-105.
[14]	XIE Wenjun, CHEN Haipeng, GUO Jing, CHEN Yuheng, PENG Kaidi, LÜ Linbing. Quality inspection for GlobeLand30 update data and common problems analysis [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 0(9): 114-118.
[15]	CHEN Jianhua, WEI Dehong, ZHANG Xingfu, LI Weichao. Correction of system bias between large-area GNSS leveling and gravity field model [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 0(8): 76-80.

Comparison of GNSS Data Quality Check Tool TEQC and SpiderQC

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments