Remote sensing monitoring and analysis of territorial space changes in Inner Mongolia in the past 30 years based on the major function-oriented zoning

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2023.0104

Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 54-58.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2023.0104

Previous Articles Next Articles

Remote sensing monitoring and analysis of territorial space changes in Inner Mongolia in the past 30 years based on the major function-oriented zoning

WANG Junzhi¹, DOU Yinyin², XUE Zhizhong¹, GUO Changqing², CHI Wenfeng³

1. Inner Mongolia Institute of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, Hohhot 010010, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
3. College of Resources and Environment Economy, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010070, China

Received:2022-08-29 Revised:2023-02-24 Published:2023-04-25

Abstract

Abstract: The spatio-temporal patterns of territorial space development intensity in Inner Mongolia in the past 30 years (1990—2020) are investigated by integrating geographical national data and land use/cover data with a 30 m resolution. Then, the changes in territorial space were compared before and after the implementation of major function-oriented zoning. The impact of the major function-oriented zones on their main components is evaluated further. The results indicated that the intensity of territorial space development in Inner Mongolia showed a trend from the acceleration of 1990—2010 to the slowdown of growth in 2010—2020. The area of artificial construction land has expanded by 42% in the past 30 years. The increase in artificial construction land and agricultural land has reduced the amount of natural land. Since the implementation of major function-oriented zoning, the area of artificial construction land within the key development zone has increased. The area of agricultural land in the main producing zone for agricultural products changed from growth to reduction. The natural land area in the key ecological function zone declined. The outcomes are crucial for achieving the goals of “Beautiful Inner Mongolia” and advancing regional ecological civilization.

Key words: territorial space development intensity, territorial space pattern, major function-oriented zones, key ecological functional zone, land use change

CLC Number:

P237

WANG Junzhi, DOU Yinyin, XUE Zhizhong, GUO Changqing, CHI Wenfeng. Remote sensing monitoring and analysis of territorial space changes in Inner Mongolia in the past 30 years based on the major function-oriented zoning[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2023, 0(4): 54-58.

References

[1] 国家发展和改革委员会. 全国及各地区主体功能区规划(下)[M]. 北京:人民出版社, 2015.
[2] 魏伟,夏俊楠,洪梦谣,等. 1980-2018年长江经济带主体功能空间演化研究[J]. 城市规划学刊,2021(3):28-35.
[3] 匡文慧,张树文,杜国明,等. 2015-2020年中国土地利用变化遥感制图及时空特征分析[J]. 地理学报,2022,77(5):1056-1071.
[4] 樊杰. 地域功能-结构的空间组织途径——对国土空间规划实施主体功能区战略的讨论[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(10):2373-2387.
[5] PREVOST A,ROBERT S. Local spatial planning practices in four French Mediterranean coastal territories under pressure[J]. Land Use Policy,2016,56:68-80.
[6] SPAANS M. Recent changes in the Dutch planning system:towards a new governance model[J]. Town Planning Review,2006,77(2):127-146.
[7] LUNAN D. British rocketry and space development[J]. Space Policy,2001,17(3):227-228.
[8] FISCHER T B,KIDD S,JHA-THAKUR U, et al. Learning through EC directive based SEA in spatial planning? Evidence from the Brunswick Region in Germany[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2009,29(6):421-428.
[9] 朱传耿,马晓冬,孟召,等. 地域主体功能区划:理论·方法·实证[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2007.
[10] 高国力. 我国主体功能区划分及其分类政策初步研究[J]. 宏观经济研究,2007(4):3-10.
[11] 周璞,刘天科,沈悦,等. 基于生态位理论的国土空间功能发展绩效评价:以山西省主体功能区为例[J]. 中国国土资源经济,2021,34(9):40-46.
[12] LIU Wenchao,LIU Jiyuan,KUANG Wenhui,et al. Examining the influence of the implementation of major function-oriented zones on built-up area expansion in China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2017,27(6):643-660.
[13] 傅伯杰,王晓峰,冯晓明,等.国家生态屏障区生态系统评估[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2017.
[14] 郭二果,李现华,祁瑜,等. 国家北方重要生态安全屏障保护与建设[J]. 中国环境管理,2021,13(2):80-85.
[15] 王玉华,高学磊,白力军,等. 内蒙古北方生态安全屏障建设研究[J]. 环境与发展,2019,31(9):202-205.
[16] KUANG Wenhui,ZHANG Shuwen,DU Guoming,et al. Monitoring periodically national land use changes and analyzing their spatiotemporal patterns in China during 2015-2020[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2022,32(9):1705-1723.
[17] KUANG Wenhui. 70 years of urban expansion across China:trajectory,pattern,and national policies[J]. Science Bulletin,2020,65(23):1970-1974.
[18] 郭锐,陈东,樊杰.国土空间规划体系与不同层级规划间的衔接[J].地理研究,2019,38(10):2518-2526.

Remote sensing monitoring and analysis of territorial space changes in Inner Mongolia in the past 30 years based on the major function-oriented zoning

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 5

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANG Rui, LI Chaokui, YAO Siyu, LI Weigui. Study on the change factors of construction land in Taiyuan by integrating geographic detector and geographically weighted regression [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(5): 106-109,119.
[2]	LI Peng, LI Chu'an, YANG Jimei, LI Zhenhong, WANG Houjie. Multi-source remote sensing monitoring and prediction of urban expansion in typical coastal zone: a case study of Qingdao [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(1): 105-109.
[3]	CHEN Wangmeng, LI Tong, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Hongri, YAN Min, DU Yuefei. Change monitoring of aquaculture ponds on the west bank of Ha Long Bay based on remote sensing technology and analysis of its impact on production-living-ecological land [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 0(9): 66-71.
[4]	ZHAO Xiangyang, ZHAO Yun. Analysis of land use change based on geographical provincial condition monitoring: taking old industrial zone in the east of Jinan as an example [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 0(8): 122-125,159.
[5]	LIU Bin, BAI Shaoyun, YU Peiheng, CHEN Min, PAN Jiawei, CHEN Yiyun. Land use analysis of plateau lake watershed based on GF and multi-source data [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2019, 0(12): 77-82.