大范围GNSS水准与重力场模型间的系统偏差校正

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2020.0252

测绘通报 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 76-80.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2020.0252

大范围GNSS水准与重力场模型间的系统偏差校正

陈鑑华, 魏德宏, 张兴福, 李伟超

广东工业大学测绘工程系, 广东广州 510006

收稿日期:2020-04-24 修回日期:2020-06-11 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2020-09-01
通讯作者: 魏德宏。E-mail:weidh2011@163.com E-mail:weidh2011@163.com
作者简介:陈鑑华(1997-),男,硕士,主要从事大地测量数据处理。E-mail:gdut_cjh@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41674006）

Correction of system bias between large-area GNSS leveling and gravity field model

CHEN Jianhua, WEI Dehong, ZHANG Xingfu, LI Weichao

Departments of Surveying and Mapping, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received:2020-04-24 Revised:2020-06-11 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 大范围GNSS水准数据是评估重力场模型精度的重要独立数据源，通常大范围GNSS水准数据与地球重力场模型所对应的大地水准面不一致，导致两者间会存在系统偏差，该系统偏差会影响直接利用GNSS水准数据评估重力场模型精度的效果。本文以利用美国24 152个GNSS水准数据评估EIGEN-6C4重力场模型精度为例，提出采用分区常系统偏差校正法和四、五、七参数校正法校正两者间的系统偏差。试验结果表明，分区常系统偏差校正法和四、五、七参数校正法均可以有效校正两者间的系统偏差，系统偏差校正后，2160阶次的EIGEN-6C4模型在美国区域内的高程异常精度优于10 cm。

关键词: GNSS/水准, 重力场模型, 精度评估, 系统偏差, 参数法

Abstract: Large-area GNSS leveling data is important independent data sources for estimating the accuracy of the gravity field model. Generally, the system bias is caused by the geoid difference between the large-area GNSS leveling and gravity field model, which has an effect on estimating the accuracy of the gravity field model by directly using GNSS leveling data. Taking the 24 152 US GNSS leveling data to estimate EIGEN-6C4 model as an example, this paper proposes to use the divisional constant system bias correction method and the four/five/seven -parameters correction method to correct the system bias between GNSS leveling and gravity field model. The results show that the system bias can be determined and effectively corrected by using the correction method of the bias of the constant system and four/five/seven-parameters method. After correcting the system bias, the accuracy of 2160 degree EIGEN-6C4 model in the US is better than 10 cm.

Key words: GNSS leveling, gravity field model, accuracy estimation, systematic bias, method of parameters

中图分类号:

P223

陈鑑华, 魏德宏, 张兴福, 李伟超. 大范围GNSS水准与重力场模型间的系统偏差校正[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(8): 76-80.

CHEN Jianhua, WEI Dehong, ZHANG Xingfu, LI Weichao. Correction of system bias between large-area GNSS leveling and gravity field model[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 0(8): 76-80.

参考文献

[1] FEATHERSTONE W E. GNSS-based heighting in Australia:current, emerging and future issues[J]. Journal of Spatial Science, 2008, 53(2):115-133.
[2] 李建成. 最新中国陆地数字高程基准模型:重力似大地水准面CNGG2011[J]. 测绘学报, 2012, 41(5):651-660.
[3] RUMMEL R. Height unification using GOCE[J]. Journal of Geodetic Science, 2012, 2(4):355-362.
[4] AMIN H,SJÖBERG L E,BAGHERBANDI M. A global vertical datum defined by the conventional geoid potential and the earth ellipsoid parameters[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2019, 93(10):1943-1961.
[5] GRUBER T,VISSER P N A M,ACKERMANN C, et al. Validation of GOCE gravity field models by means of orbit residuals and geoid comparisons[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2011, 85(11):845-860.
[6] 张兴福,刘成,刘红新. 利用GPS/水准数据检核EGM2008重力场模型的精度[J]. 测绘通报, 2009(2):7-9.
[7] 章传银,郭春喜,陈俊勇,等. EGM 2008地球重力场模型在中国大陆适用性分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2009, 38(4):283-289.
[8] 张兴福,李博峰,魏德宏,等. 多类重力场模型的精度分析及联合确定GPS点正常高的方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2013, 42(1):6-12.
[9] 姜元军,韩勇. EIGEN-6C重力场模型在中国地区的GPS/水准验证[J]. 测绘通报, 2013(9):45-46.
[10] 高春春,陆洋,张子占,等. GOCE地球重力场模型在青藏地区的评价及分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2014, 43(1):21-29.
[11] 赵德军,徐新强,陈永祥,等. GOCE重力场模型的精度评估[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2015, 35(2):322-325.
[12] GRUBER T. Evaluation of the EGM2008 gravity field by means of GPS-levelling and sea surface topography solutions[J]. Newton's Bulletin, 2009(4):3-17.
[13] KOSTELECKÝ J,KLOKOCNÍK J,BUCHA B, et al. Evaluation of the gravity field model EIGEN-6C4 in comparison with EGM2008 by means of various functions of the gravity potential and by GNSS/levelling[J]. Geoinformatics FCE CTU, 2015, 14(1):7-28.
[14] EL-ASHQUER M,ELSAKA B,EL-FIKY G. On the accuracy assessment of the latest releases of GOCE satellite-based geopotential models with EGM2008 and terrestrial GPS/levelling and gravity data over Egypt[J]. International Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 7(11):1323-1344.
[15] HIRT C. Efficient and accurate high-degree spherical harmonic synthesis of gravity field functionals at the earth's surface using the gradient approach[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2012, 86(9):729-744.
[16] GODAH W,KRYNSKI J. Comparison of GGMs based on one year GOCE observations with the EGM08 and terrestrial data over the area of Sudan[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinforma-tion, 2015, 35:128-135.

大范围GNSS水准与重力场模型间的系统偏差校正

Correction of system bias between large-area GNSS leveling and gravity field model

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蔡嘉伦, 贾洪果, 刘国祥, 张波, 刘巧, 吴仁哲, 向卫, 毛文飞, 张瑞. 对比传统低空航测的无人机倾斜摄影测量精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(2): 31-36.
[2]	刘家龙, 贾小林, 陶清瑞, 伏军胜, 张奋. 多系统广播电离层模型精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(1): 66-71,78.
[3]	何志敏, 许军. 大亚湾水域水位控制实施与精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(5): 137-139.
[4]	窦超, 安向东, 赵利江, 张生鹏, 毕泰武. 格尔木市高精度数字高程基准模型研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(8): 108-111.
[5]	李红慧, 李建刚. MGEX广播星历轨道和钟差的精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(12): 101-105.
[6]	胡耀锋, 胡欣然. 基于LiDAR的城市坐标系精度评估及应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(10): 101-105.
[7]	王宁, 刘万青, 姚志宏, 刘春春. 多源DEM数据地形因子表达准确性分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(9): 39-44.
[8]	罗陶荣, 王中元, 梁宁, 马效申. 利用EGM2008模型与加权组合模型进行高程异常拟合[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(1): 28-32.
[9]	谢小伟, 许才军, 龚正, 李伟. 利用GRACE反演陕甘晋高原地下水储量变化[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(1): 133-137.
[10]	俞建人, 李涛, 申淑娟. 倾斜摄影三维模型的房檐改正方法分析与精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2017, 0(5): 75-78,109.
[11]	祁玉杰. 对常用大地坐标系间坐标转换方法的评价[J]. 测绘通报, 2017, 0(4): 13-16.
[12]	黄昆学, 常晓涛. 不同月球重力场模型的比较与分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2016, 0(4): 21-23,71.
[13]	张兴福, 张永毅, 王兵海. 区域高程基准统一方法及精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2016, 0(3): 15-17,21.
[14]	丁建勋, 胡冬芽, 马德富, 高春辉. 珠海市陆海统一高精度GNSS控制网数据处理与精度评估方法研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2016, 0(3): 61-65.
[15]	吴帮, 花向红, 邱卫宁, 冯健, 许利. 同构设备之间RSSI系统偏差对WiFi定位的影响及修正研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2016, 0(2): 69-71,90.