测绘通报 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 61-65.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2020.0355

• 学术研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

一种基于3ds Max与Smart 3D的三维模型构建方法

徐金财1,2, 李朝奎1,2, 陈建辉1,2   

  1. 1. 湖南科技大学地理空间信息技术国家地方联合工程实验室, 湖南 湘潭 411201;
    2. 湖南科技大学测绘遥感信息工程湖南省重点实验室, 湖南 湘潭 411201
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-12 出版日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-11-30
  • 通讯作者: 李朝奎。E-mail:616059644@qq.com E-mail:616059644@qq.com
  • 作者简介:徐金财(1996-),男,硕士,主要研究方向为三维建模。E-mail:phantomxjc@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省重点研发项目(2018GK2015)

A city 3D model construction method based on 3ds Max and Smart 3D

XU Jincai1,2, LI Chaokui1,2, CHEN Jianhui1,2   

  1. 1. National-local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Geo-spatial Information Technology, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China;
    2. HunanProvince Key Laboratory of Geo-information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
  • Received:2020-05-12 Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-11-30

摘要: 基于某大学图书馆点云数据及航摄相片,本文采用3ds Max与Smart 3D两种方法构建三维模型。一方面,采取人机交互的方式进行建模,将三维激光点云数据导入3ds Max软件建立三维数字模型;另一方面,使用半自动人工方式建模,采用Smart 3D软件,将航摄像片数据经过空三加密、自动建模、贴图等操作后对建筑实体建模。从建模效率、模型美观性、建模精度、适用对象等方面比较了两种建模方式的特点与区别。结果表明,3ds Max更加适用于规则体、高精度建模,同时建模的效率相对较低;Smart 3D建模效率高,更加适用于大场景范围的快速建模。本文研究结论有助于不同需求背景下建模方法的选取,为研究、工程及试验提供了三维建模方法选择参考。

关键词: 城市三维模型, 建模效率, 建模精度, 3ds Max, Smart 3D

Abstract: Based on the point cloud data and aerial photos of a university library, the 3D model is constructed by using 3ds Max and Smart 3D. On the one hand, the method of human-computer interaction is adopted for modeling, and the 3D laser point cloud data is imported into 3ds Max software to establish the 3D digital model. On the other hand, the semi-automatic manual mode is used for modeling, and the Smart 3D software is used to model the building entity after the aerial camera data is encrypted, automatically modeled, mapped and other operations. The characteristics and differences of the two modeling methods are compared in terms of modeling efficiency, model aesthetics, modeling accuracy and applicable objects. The research shows that 3ds Max is more suitable for regular body and high-precision modeling, while the efficiency of modeling is relatively low; Smart 3D modeling is more efficient and more suitable for rapid modeling in a large range of scenes. The conclusions are helpful to the selection of modeling methods under different requirements, and provide a reference for the selection of 3D modeling methods for research, engineering and experiment.

Key words: city 3D model, modeling efficiency, modeling accuracy, 3ds Max, Smart 3D

中图分类号: