北斗不同电离层模型精度分析

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2020.0251

测绘通报 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 71-75.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2020.0251

北斗不同电离层模型精度分析

周金宁¹, 赵齐乐¹, 胡志刚¹, 蔡洪亮², 周仁宇¹

1. 武汉大学卫星导航定位技术研究中心, 湖北武汉 430079;
2. 北京跟踪与通信技术研究所, 北京 100094

收稿日期:2019-11-22 修回日期:2020-01-10 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2020-09-01
作者简介:周金宁(1995-),女,硕士生,研究方向为电离层建模与PPP。E-mail:zhoujn@whu.edu.cn

Evaluation on the precision of different BDS ionosphere model

ZHOU Jinning¹, ZHAO Qile¹, HU Zhigang¹, CAI Hongliang², ZHOU Renyu¹

1. GNSS Research Center of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. Beijing Institute of Tracking and Communication Technology, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2019-11-22 Revised:2020-01-10 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前北斗系统播发多种电离层模型参数，用户使用时容易产生以下问题：①同一历元不同卫星播发同一电离层模型，其值不完全相同；②北斗二号、北斗三号分别播发的Klobuchar电离层模型参数值存在差异；③对于能同时接收到3种电离层模型（BDS-2 Klobuchar、BDS-3 Klobuchar及北斗全球电离层延迟修正模型（BDGIM））的基本导航用户如何选取合适的电离层模型。针对以上问题，本文首先提出采用最大投票法策略，对同一历元相同电离层模型但值不同的参数进行合理合并，然后以IGS分析中心的电离层产品为基准，对以上3种北斗电离层模型进行了精度分析和对比，最后基于等效距离误差进行了验证分析。试验结果表明，BDS-2 Klobuchar、BDS-3 Klobuchar虽然模型值差异较大但模型精度十分接近，而BDGIM模型精度最高，相对于前两者在中低纬地区平均提升10%，在两极地区的提升更加明显，平均提升61%。

关键词: BDS-2 Klobuchar, BDS-3 Klobuchar, BDGIM, 广播电离层模型, 用户等效距离误差

Abstract: At present, BDS broadcasts a variety of ionospheric model parameters, which causes the following confusion when users use it:①Different satellites may broadcast the same ionospheric model with different values in the same interval. ②The klobuchar model broadcast respectively by BDS-2 and BDS-3 are quite different. ③How to select the proper model from the three types of ionospheric model (BDS-2 Klobuchar、BDS-3 Klobuchar、BDGIM) that can be received at the same time. To propose a solution overcoming current shortcoming, this paper firstly proposes the maximum voting strategy to reasonably combine the parameters of the ionosphere models in the same calendar but with different values. Then, based on the ionosphere products of IGS analysis center, the accuracy of three BeiDou ionosphere model is analyzed and compared. Finally, the validation analysis is carried out based on the user equivalent range error(UERE). The results show that although the model values of BDS-2 Klobuchar and BDS-3 Klobuchar are quite different, the accuracy of the model is very close. Besides, the accuracy of BGDIM model is the highest, with 10% improvement compared with BDS-k8 model in the middle and low latitude area, and 61% improvement in the polar regions.

Key words: BDS-2 Klobuchar, BDS-3 Klobuchar, BDGIM, broadcast ionosphere model, UERE

中图分类号:

P228

周金宁, 赵齐乐, 胡志刚, 蔡洪亮, 周仁宇. 北斗不同电离层模型精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(8): 71-75.

ZHOU Jinning, ZHAO Qile, HU Zhigang, CAI Hongliang, ZHOU Renyu. Evaluation on the precision of different BDS ionosphere model[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 0(8): 71-75.

参考文献

[1] 章红平, 平劲松, 朱文耀,等. 电离层延迟改正模型综述[J].天文学进展, 2006, 24(1):16-26.
[2] 李秀海, 曹先革, 张为成, 等. 不同电离层VTEC模型的建模效果比较[J].测绘通报, 2012(S1):23-25.
[3] 党亚民, 许长辉, 王虎, 等. 国家北斗动态基准服务产品精度分析[J].测绘科学技术学报, 2019, 44(6):23-28.
[4] LUO W H, LIU Z Z, LI M. A preliminary evaluation of the performance of multiple ionospheric models in low- and mid-latitude regions of China in 2010-2011[J].GPS Solutions, 2014, 18(2):297-308.
[5] 孙满, 喻金, 胡艳, 等. 北斗电离层模型改正精度分析[J].测绘科学技术学报, 2015, 32(1):27-31.
[6] WU X L, ZHOU J H, WANG G, et al. Evaluation of COMPASS ionospheric model in GNSS positioning[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2013, 51(6):959-968.
[7] 周仁宇, 胡志刚, 苏牡丹, 等. 北斗全球系统广播电离层模型性能初步评估[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2019, 44(10):1457-1464.
[8] 张强, 赵齐乐, 章红平, 等. 北斗卫星导航系统Klobuchar模型精度评估[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014, 39(2):142-146.
[9] 李文文, 李敏, 胡志刚, 等. 两种电离层模型对卫星导航定位精度的影响分析[J].导航定位学报, 2013, 1(3):43-47.
[10] KLOBUCHAR J A. Ionospheric time-delay algorithm for single-frequency gps users[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Eletronic Systems, 1987, 23(3):325-331.
[11] 余明, 郭际明, 过静珺. GPS电离层延迟Klobuchar模型与双频数据解算值的比较与分析[J].测绘通报, 2004(6):5-8.
[12] OFFICE C S N. BeiDou navigation satellite system signal in space interface control document open service signal B1C and B2a (test version)[M]. Beijing:[s.n.], 2018.
[13] 李耿浩, 赵梦琪. 北斗系统电离层模型参数改正精度分析[J].全球定位系统, 2014, 39(5):79-81.
[14] 郭睿, 周建华, 胡小工, 等. 北斗IGSO卫星姿态零偏航状态下精密定轨[J].测绘学报, 2018, 47(S0):18-27.
[15] 王泽民, 杜玉军, 熊云琪, 等. 北斗系统在南极中山站地区的基本定位性能评估[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2017, 42(8):1027-1034.
[16] XU Fulong. An Investigation of Optimal Machine Learning Methods for the Prediction of ROTI[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2020, 3(2):1-15 doi:10.11947/j.JGGS.2020.0201.
[17] GAO Yangjun. Adaptive Robust Filtering Algorithm for BDS Medium and Long Baseline Three Carrier Ambiguity Resolution[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2020, 3(2):53-61 doi:10.11947/j.JGGS.2020.0206.

北斗不同电离层模型精度分析

Evaluation on the precision of different BDS ionosphere model

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价