GTDM:一种获取全球对流层延迟的新模型

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2021.0047

测绘通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 72-76.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2021.0047

GTDM:一种获取全球对流层延迟的新模型

马永超¹, 吕志平¹, 许国昌¹, 陈鹏², 袁勘省³

1. 哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)空间科学与应用技术研究院, 广东深圳 518055;
2. 西安科技大学测绘科学与技术学院, 陕西西安 710054;
3. 西北大学城市与环境学院, 陕西西安 710075

收稿日期:2020-08-10 发布日期:2021-03-09
通讯作者: 吕志平。E-mail:ssscenter@126.com
作者简介:马永超(1993-),男,博士,主要研究方向为GNSS空间环境学。E-mail:ma_yongchao@outlook.com
基金资助:
西安科技大学优秀青年科技基金（2018YQ2-10）

GTDM: a new model for generating global tropospheric delay

MA Yongchao¹, Lü Zhiping¹, XU Guochang¹, CHEN Peng², YUAN Kansheng³

1. Institute of Space Science and Applied Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China;
2. College of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China;
3. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northwest University, Xi'an 710075, China

Received:2020-08-10 Published:2021-03-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对流层延迟是GNSS定位的主要误差源。现有的各对流层延迟模型大多存在过度拟合的弊端，不能反映延迟在短时间内的细节变化。本文利用2011-2017年ECMWF气象资料分析了对流层延迟的变化特征，发现同一格网相邻年份之间全球对流层延迟偏差绝大多数在5 cm内。在此基础上，本文提出了一种非参数拟合的对流层延迟模型GTDM。经验证，GTDM模型具有较好的拟合效果。本文将2016-2017年IGS分析中心提供的对流层延迟产品数据、探空气象数据解算的对流层延迟作为外检核数据，验证结果表明，GTDM模型在全球范围的精度均优于GZTD、GPT2w、UNB3m模型。GTDM模型建模方法简单，可避免过度拟合对流层延迟值的问题，能够有效地反映对流层延迟变化特征。

关键词: 对流层延迟, 对流层延迟模型, GZTD, GPT2w, UNB3m

Abstract: Tropospheric delay is the main error source in GNSS positioning. Various existing tropospheric delay models have the disadvantage of overfitting, the details of delay changes in a short time. In this paper, the variation characteristics of tropospheric delay are analyzed by using the meteorological data of ECMWF from 2011 to 2017. It is found that the global tropospheric delay deviation between adjacent years of the same grid is mostly within 5 cm. Accordingly, a new tropospheric delay model GTDM is proposed. It has been verified that GTDM has a good fitting effect. In this paper, the data from 2016-2017 are used as the external compliance inspection data including the tropospheric delay product data of IGS stations provided by the IGS analysis center and the tropospheric delay calculated by the reanalysis of meteorological data by the sounding data. The results show that the accuracy of GTDM is higher than that of GZTD, GPT2w, UNB3m in global. A simple modeling method, GTDM can avoid overfitting the value of tropospheric delay and reflect the characteristics of tropospheric delay changes effectively.

Key words: tropospheric delay, tropospheric delay model, GZTD, GPT2w, UNB3m

中图分类号:

P228

马永超, 吕志平, 许国昌, 陈鹏, 袁勘省. GTDM:一种获取全球对流层延迟的新模型[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(2): 72-76.

MA Yongchao, Lü Zhiping, XU Guochang, CHEN Peng, YUAN Kansheng. GTDM: a new model for generating global tropospheric delay[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(2): 72-76.

参考文献

[1] PENNA N, DODSON A, CHEN W. Assessment of EGNOS tropospheric correction model[J]. Journal of Navigation, 2001, 54(1):37-55.
[2] LI W, YUAN Y B, OU J K, et al. A new global zenith tropospheric delay model IGGtrop for GNSS applications[J]. Chinese ence Bulletin, 2012(17):2132-2139.
[3] COLLINS J P. Assessment and development of a tropo-spheric delay model for aircraft users of the global positioning system[D]. New Brunswick:University of New Brunswick, 1999.
[4] COLLINS P, LANGLEY R B. Tropospheric delay-prediction for the WAAS user[J]. GPS World, 1999, 10(7):52-58.
[5] BOEHM J, HEINKELMANN R, SCHUH H. Short note:a global model of pressure and temperature for geodetic applications[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2007, 81(10):679-683.
[6] KOUBA J. Testing of global pressure/temperature (GPT) model and global mapping function (GMF) in GPS analyses[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2009, 83(3-4):199-208.
[7] LU C, ZUS F, GE M, et al. Tropospheric delay parameters from numerical weather models for multi-GNSS precise positioning[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2016, 9(12):5965-5973.
[8] BOHM J, MOELLER G, SCHINDELEGGER M, et al. Development of an improved empirical model for slant delays in the troposphere (GPT2w)[J]. GPS Solutions, 2015, 19(3):433-441.
[9] 李薇, 袁运斌, 欧吉坤,等. 全球对流层天顶延迟模型IGGtrop的建立与分析[J]. 科学通报, 2012, 57(15):1317-1320.
[10] ZHANG H X, YUAN Y B, LI W, et al. Assessment of three tropospheric delay models (IGGtrop, EGNOS and UNB3m) based on precise point positioning in the Chinese region[J]. Sensors, 2016, 16(1):122-134.
[11] 姚宜斌, 何畅勇, 张豹, 等. 一种新的全球对流层天顶延迟模型GZTD[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(7):2218-2227.
[12] 陈钦明, 宋淑丽, 朱文耀. 亚洲地区ECMWF/NCEP资料计算ZTD的精度分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(5):1541-1548.
[13] MA Z Q, CAO Q M. Study on accuracy of ZTD and ZWD calculated from ERA-interim data over China[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2012, 32(2):100-104.

[1]	李宏达, 张显云, 廖留峰, 李婷, 聂士海. 利用GPS/BDS/GLONASS/Galileo组合PPP反演大气可降水量[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(6): 63-66,98.
[2]	刘伟, 刘国超, 郑小战, 张庆华. 改进CIR算法在BDS长基线模糊度解算中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(10): 74-78.
[3]	刘志平, 朱丹彤, 王潜心, 王坚. 利用NMF算法确定ZTD格网产品空间分辨率[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(5): 6-10,19.
[4]	宋佳, 李敏, 赵齐乐, 戴志强. 一种区域实时对流层内插模型及其在PPP中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(4): 1-5,15.
[5]	刘中流, 任超, 甘祥前, 梁春丽. 一种基于SARIMA的经验对流层延迟模型[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(3): 14-17,31.
[6]	李滢, 陈明剑, 左宗, 姚翔. 网络RTK对流层延迟内插模型精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(1): 33-37,43.
[7]	郑韵, 王洪栋. GPT和GPT2模型的偏差对定位结果的影响[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(1): 112-116.
[8]	王建敏, 李亚博, 马天明, 祝会忠. 大范围网络RTK基准站间整周模糊度实时快速解算[J]. 测绘通报, 2017, 0(10): 7-11.
[9]	丁茂华, 胡伍生. 一种优化的基于神经网络的经验ZTD模型[J]. 测绘通报, 2017, 0(1): 22-25,52.
[10]	杨晶, 顾慧, 王勇, 吴亮, 曹志勇, 高永芹. 基于EMD的GPS对流层延迟变化分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2016, 0(6): 55-59,90.
[11]	赵章明, 冯径, 洪亮. 卫星定位中对流层延迟模型对比分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2016, 0(11): 18-21,136.
[12]	杨晶, 顾慧, 刘严萍, 吴亮, 高悦. 基于小波分析的GPS对流层延迟变化研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2015, 0(5): 60-62.
[13]	董春来李传奇蒋廷臣. 对流层延迟改正模型的敏感性分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2014, 0(9): 70-72.
[14]	曹文涛郭际明谢翔周命端贾效燕. 对流层水平梯度对PPP的影响[J]. 测绘通报, 2014, 0(2): 13-15.
[15]	王利杰李思敏蔡成林李天松. 基于不同高度角的对流层延迟改正模型选择[J]. 测绘通报, 2013, 0(8): 10-13.

GTDM:一种获取全球对流层延迟的新模型

GTDM: a new model for generating global tropospheric delay

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价