基于洪涝灾害韧性GIS空间量化评价的城市应急避难规划

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2024.0130

测绘通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 169-174.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2024.0130

基于洪涝灾害韧性GIS空间量化评价的城市应急避难规划

姜沣珊¹, 傅星峰¹, 赵雷^2,3, 解智强^1,3, 王占辉⁴

1. 云南大学地球科学学院, 云南昆明 650500;
2. 昆明市测绘管理中心, 云南昆明 650506;
3. 云南大学国际河流与生态安全研究院, 云南昆明 650500;
4. 广州南方测绘科技股份有限公司, 广东广州 510663

收稿日期:2023-02-13 修回日期:2023-10-31 出版日期:2024-01-25 发布日期:2024-01-30
通讯作者: 赵雷。E-mail:kmzhaolei@126.com
作者简介:姜沣珊(1999—),女,硕士生,主要研究方向为城市内涝韧性评价研究与GIS量化表达。E-mail:florachaing@mail.ynu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(72361035);长江水利委员会长江科学院开放研究基金(CKWV20221029/KY);云南省产教融合研究生联合培养基地建设项目;云南省教育厅科学研究基金(2023Y0185);云南省住房和城乡建设厅科技计划(K00000135);云南大学2023年研究生课程思政示范课程项目(KCSZ202301;KCSZ202316)

Urban emergency shelter planning based on GIS spatial quantitative evaluation of flood resilience

JIANG Fengshan¹, FU Xingfeng¹, ZHAO Lei^2,3, XIE Zhiqiang^1,3, WANG Zhanhui⁴

1. Yunnan University, School of Earth Sciences, Kunming 650500, China;
2. Kunming Surveying and Mapping Management Center, Kunming 650506, China;
3. Institute of International Rivers and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China;
4. Guangzhou Southern Surveying and Mapping Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510663, China

Received:2023-02-13 Revised:2023-10-31 Online:2024-01-25 Published:2024-01-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在全球气候变化与城市化进程加快的背景下,极端天气的产生导致城市洪涝灾害频发,成为威胁公众生命财产安全的主要自然灾害。因此,提高城市面对暴雨洪涝的能力,是城市化进程中面临的主要任务。本文以云南省昆明市主城五区为研究区域,通过洪涝灾害韧性GIS空间量化评价,对洪灾易发点、避难场所点,以及最短逃生路径、卫生医疗设施距离等进行相关分析,研究洪灾应急规划有效方法,并通过增强城市洪灾韧性,提高昆明市对洪灾的预防能力。研究结果表明,昆明市目前仍存在一定的洪涝灾害隐患,近几年随着城市规划的不断更新,昆明市主城区排水设施对于极端暴雨已经具备一定的抵抗力,但仍有提升空间。

关键词: 洪灾预防, 洪涝抵抗力, 应急规划, GIS量化表达

Abstract: In the context of global climate change and accelerated urbanization, the occurrence of extreme weather leads to frequent urban floods and becomes a major natural disaster threatening public life and property. Therefore, improving the ability of cities to face storm floods is the main task in the process of urbanization. This paper takes the five districts in the main city of Kunming Yunnan province as the research area, through the relevant analysis of flood-prone points and refuge sites, based on the relevant analysis of the shortest escape path planning, health, and medical facilities distance and other factors, studies the effective flood emergency planning method, and improves the flood prevention capacity of Kunming by enhancing the resilience of urban flood. The research results show that there are still some hidden dangers of flood and waterlogging in Kunming. In recent years, with the continuous updating of urban planning, the drainage system of the main urban area of Kunming has a certain resistance to extreme rainstorms, but there is still room for improvement.

Key words: flood prevention, flood resistance, emergency planning, GIS quantitative expression

中图分类号:

P208

姜沣珊, 傅星峰, 赵雷, 解智强, 王占辉. 基于洪涝灾害韧性GIS空间量化评价的城市应急避难规划[J]. 测绘通报, 2024, 0(1): 169-174.

JIANG Fengshan, FU Xingfeng, ZHAO Lei, XIE Zhiqiang, WANG Zhanhui. Urban emergency shelter planning based on GIS spatial quantitative evaluation of flood resilience[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2024, 0(1): 169-174.

参考文献

[1] 杨帆,许莹,段宁. 城市洪涝韧性治理体系的智慧化转型与实现路径创新[J]. 城市发展研究,2021,28(5): 119-126.
[2] 戴维·R·戈德沙尔克,许婵. 城市减灾: 创建韧性城市[J]. 国际城市规划,2015,30(2): 22-29.
[3] DA SILVA L B L,ALENCAR M H,DE ALMEIDA A T. Exploring global sensitivity analysis on a risk-based MCDM/a model to support urban adaptation policies against floods[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,2022,73: 102898.
[4] 谢映霞. 从城市内涝灾害频发看排水规划的发展趋势[J]. 城市规划,2013,37(2): 45-50.
[5] 汪辉,任懿璐,卢思琪,等. 以生态智慧引导下的城市韧性应对洪涝灾害的威胁与发生[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(16): 4958-4960.
[6] 孙阳,张落成,姚士谋. 基于社会生态系统视角的长三角地级城市韧性度评价[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(8): 151-158.
[7] 李亚,翟国方. 我国城市灾害韧性评估及其提升策略研究[J]. 规划师,2017,33(8): 5-11.
[8] 方东平,李在上,李楠,等.城市韧性:基于“三度空间下系统的系统”的思考[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(7):1-7.
[9] 仇保兴.基于复杂适应系统理论的韧性城市设计方法及原则[J].城市发展研究,2018,25(10):1-3.
[10] 郑艳,翟建青,武占云,等.基于适应性周期的韧性城市分类评价:以我国海绵城市与气候适应型城市试点为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(3):31-38.
[11] 白立敏,修春亮,冯兴华,等.中国城市韧性综合评估及其时空分异特征[J].世界地理研究,2019,28(6):77-87.
[12] 李雯,姜仁贵,解建仓,等.基于系统动力学的城市内涝灾害应急管理模型[J].水资源保护,2022,38(5):51-57.
[13] 蔡云楠,温钊鹏.提升城市韧性的气候适应性规划技术探索[J].规划师,2017,33(8):18-24.
[14] MIGUEZ M G,VERÓL A P. A catchment scale integrated flood resilience index to support decision making in urban flood control design[J]. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science,2017,44(5): 925-946.
[15] OLADOKUN V O,PROVERBS D G,LAMOND J. Measuring flood resilience: a fuzzy logic approach[J]. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation,2017,35(5): 470-487.
[16] BERTILSSON L,WIKLUND K,DE MOURA TEBALDI I,et al. Urban flood resilience: a multi-criteria index to integrate flood resilience into urban planning[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2019,573: 970-982.
[17] MOGHADAS M,ASADZADEH A,VAFEIDIS A,et al. A multi-criteria approach for assessing urban flood resilience in Tehran,Iran[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,2019,35: 101069.
[18] SINGH P,SINHA V S P,VIJHANI A,et al. Vulnerability assessment of urban road network from urban flood[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,2018,28: 237-250.
[19] ZHU Shiyao,LI Dezhi,HUANG Guanying,et al. Enhancing urban flood resilience: a holistic framework incorporating historic worst flood to Yangtze River Delta,China[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,2021,61: 102355.
[20] 陈长坤,陈以琴,施波,等.雨洪灾害情境下城市韧性评估模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(4):1-6.
[21] ROY S,BOSE A,SINGHA N,et al. Urban waterlogging risk as an undervalued environmental challenge: an integrated MCDA-GIS based modeling approach[J]. Environmental Challenges,2021,4: 100194.
[22] TAYYAB M,ZHANG Jiquan,HUSSAIN M,et al. GIS-based urban flood resilience assessment using urban flood resilience model: a case study of Peshawar city,khyber pakhtunkhwa,Pakistan[J]. Remote Sensing,2021,13(10): 1864.
[23] YU Dapeng,YIN Jie,WILBY R,et al. Disruption of emergency response to vulnerable populations during floods[J]. Nature Sustainability,2020,3: 728-736.
[24] WANG Yuntao,MENG Fanlin,LIU Haixing,et al. Assessing catchment scale flood resilience of urban areas using a grid cell based metric[J]. Water Research,2019,163: 114852.
[25] XU Wenping,ZHONG Ming,HONG Yang,et al. Enhancing community resilience to urban floods with a network structuring model[J]. Safety Science,2020,127: 104699.
[26] 陈爽,张秀英,彭立华.基于高分辨卫星影像的城市用地不透水率分析[J].资源科学,2006,28(2):41-46.

基于洪涝灾害韧性GIS空间量化评价的城市应急避难规划

Urban emergency shelter planning based on GIS spatial quantitative evaluation of flood resilience

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭瑞荣, 李朝奎, 李豪, 陈军. 面向BIM的室内拓扑-栅格分层路径规划方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2024, 0(3): 81-87.
[2]	王鸿雁, 车向红, 徐辛超, 徐胜华, 李洪胜. 利用DeepLabv3+模型提取分析街景图像绿视率——以北京三环内为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2024, 0(3): 88-94.
[3]	刘国超, 彭卫平, 刘伟. 基于新型智慧城市视角的地质灾害监测——以广州市为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2024, 0(3): 162-167.
[4]	单雅敏, 李贺颖, 张建辰, 唐岭军, 郭建忠, 王光霞, 王家耀, 张瀚雯, 郑浩华. 乡村振兴背景下黄河流域农村居民点分布格局的时空演变及其驱动力分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2024, 0(1): 96-101.
[5]	徐海, 贺彪, 蒯希, 唐骜巍, 李泽宇, 万远. 融合分层层次细节和潜在可见集的三维城市场景高效可视化[J]. 测绘通报, 2024, 0(1): 102-108.
[6]	齐杰, 王中辉, 李驿言. 基于图卷积神经网络的道路网匹配[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(12): 19-24,44.
[7]	张镇平, 李英冰, 张沛. 利用空间层次叠置方法分析江油市地下水潜力[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(12): 76-80,177.
[8]	王增铮, 张福浩, 赵阳阳, 仇阿根. 区域地理加权回归分析方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(12): 81-87.
[9]	张沛, 李英冰, 张镇平, 胡露太. 耦合递归特征消除与二维CNN的滑坡敏感性评价[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(12): 88-93.
[10]	杨延晨, 周超, 施佳湄. 基于卷积神经网络的区域滑坡易发性评价：以三峡库区万州区为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(11): 1-6.
[11]	张天颖, 史明泉, 崔丽珍, 秦岭. 融合CNN和CapsNet的Wi-Fi室内定位方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(11): 69-74,121.
[12]	王葱, 潘均, 孙尚宇, 宋伟东. 基于双目结构光技术的路面坑槽多指标提取方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(11): 75-81.
[13]	林凯伦, 杨元维, 高贤君, 谭美淋, 张跃. 多级索引框及移动向量联合的接触网提取方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(11): 82-87.
[14]	孙端正, 高飞, 叶周润, 吴言安, 张树峰, 谢荣晖. 改进PointNet++模型在道路杆状物提取中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(11): 95-99.
[15]	李政乾, 李宏伟, 赵姗. 基于熵权TOPSIS分析法的郑州市三维地质环境承载力评价[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(11): 100-106.