测绘通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (10): 98-104.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2026.1015

• 学术研究 • 上一篇    

基于深度学习的宁波中心城区地面沉降时序分析与预测

周文奇1, 彭珍1, 雷长征2, 王文军3, 郑凌逶3, 赵团芝1   

  1. 1. 宁波市自然资源生态修复和海洋管理服务中心, 浙江 宁波 315042;
    2. 浙江省工程勘察设计院集团有限公司, 浙江 宁波 315012;
    3. 浙大宁波理工学院土木建筑工程学院, 浙江 宁波 315100
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-26 发布日期:2026-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 王文军。E-mail:wwjcumt@nbt.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周文奇(1974—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害监测预警、城市地质安全风险防控等工作。E-mail:329228056@qq.com

Land subsidence time series analysis and prediction based on deep learning methods in central urban area of Ningbo

Zhou Wenqi1, Peng Zhen1, Lei Changzheng2, Wang Wenjun3, Zheng Lingwei3, Zhao Tuanzhi1   

  1. 1. Ningbo Administration and Service Centre for Marine and Ecological Restoration of Natural Resources, Ningbo 315042, China;
    2. Zhejiang Engineering Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315012, China;
    3. School of Civil Engineering &Architecture, NingboTech University, Ningbo 315100, China
  • Received:2026-02-26 Published:2026-11-06

摘要: [目的] 为评价区域地面沉降风险并掌握未来地面沉降发展趋势,常需开展地面沉降预测并探讨各类预测方法的有效性。[方法] 本文基于长时序地面沉降水准监测数据,在分析研究区地面沉降特征及与地下水相关性的基础上,采用反向传播(BP)神经网络、长短期记忆网络(LSTM)及引入注意力机制的长短期记忆网络(AM-LSTM),开展研究区地面沉降时序预测,并对比分析各方法的预测误差与预测结果。[结果] 结果表明:①采用累计沉降量的预测效果明显优于沉降速率,监测数据量与预测误差基本呈线性关系;②地下水禁采后,研究区域80%以上的地下水测点与地面沉降呈弱相关,纳入地下水位因素的沉降预测误差反而增大;③去除个别异常点后,BP和LSTM预测的平均相对误差分别为8.4%~15.8%和7.1%~7.7%,两者预测的地面沉降发展趋势基本一致,但LSTM预测值更平稳;④在测点数量较少及窗口值较小的情况下,与LSTM相比,引入注意力机制的AM-LSTM模型的预测误差基本未减小。[结论] 研究表明,基于长时序实测水准沉降数据,采用深度学习方法进行沉降时序预测可行,但采用不同方法的预测异常点数量及预测结果有一定差异,选用时要结合样本验证和误差分析。

关键词: 水准监测数据, 地面沉降, 深度学习模型, 预测误差, 时序预测

Abstract: [Purposes] To assess the risk of regional land subsidence and clarify the future development trends of regional land subsidence,it is necessary to predict land subsidence and discuss the effectiveness of various prediction methods. [Methods] In the paper,based on long-term level monitoring data,land subsidence characteristics and its relationships with groundwater level in central urban area of Ningbo were analyzed,then some deep learning models including back propagation(BP) neural network,long short-term memory (LSTM)and attention-mechanism-based long short-term memory (AM-LSTM)were used for land subsidence prediction in the study area,the corresponding prediction errors and prediction results were compared and analyzed. [Findings] The results show that: ①The prediction effect of cumulative settlement data is significantly better than that of settlement rate,and monitoring data volume and prediction error show a roughly linear relationship.②After the groundwater was banned from extraction,more than 80% of groundwater monitoring points in the study research area show weak correlation with ground subsidence,and the prediction error of land subsidence increases when groundwater level factors are taken into account.③After removing individual monitoring points,The average relative errors for BP and LSTM predictions are 8.4%~15.8% and 7.1%~7.7%,respectively.The predicted trends of land subsidence development by BP and LSTM are basically consistent,but the LSTM predictions are more stable.④When the amount of monitoring data and the sliding window size is limited,the prediction error of the AM-LSTM model incorporating attention mechanisms has essentially not decreased. [Conclusions] This study demonstrates that using the deep learning methods for subsidence time series prediction is feasible based on long-term level monitoring data,however,abnormal monitoring point quantities and prediction results vary with the different prediction models.When selecting prediction models,sample verification and error analysis should be considered.

Key words: level monitoring data, land subsidence, deep learning model, prediction error, time series prediction

中图分类号: