联合IGS、Sentinel-1、ERA5多源数据的中国台湾岛大气水汽反演

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2026.0207

测绘通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 38-45.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2026.0207

联合IGS、Sentinel-1、ERA5多源数据的中国台湾岛大气水汽反演

周磊¹, 李德伟¹, 李晓红², 狄桂栓²

1. 山东建筑大学测绘地理信息学院, 山东济南 250101;
2. 山东省国土测绘院, 山东济南 250102

收稿日期:2025-07-03 发布日期:2026-03-12
通讯作者: 李德伟。E-mail:lidewei20@sdjzu.edu.cn
作者简介:周磊(2002—),男,主要研究方向为InSAR气象学。E-mail:18954152454@163.com
基金资助:
山东省自然科学基金(ZR2021QD155)

Atmospheric water vapor retrieval over China's Taiwan Island using combined IGS/Sentinel-1/ERA5 multi-source data

ZHOU Lei¹, LI Dewei¹, LI Xiaohong², DI Guishuan²

1. School of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China;
2. Shandong Provincial Institute of Land Surveying and Mapping, Jinan 250102, China

Received:2025-07-03 Published:2026-03-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对GNSS和InSAR技术在大气水汽反演过程中存在的各项差异导致的结果不确定问题,本文提出了一种联合IGS、Sentinel-1、ERA5多源数据的高精度、空间连续的大气水汽反演方法。首先以中国台湾岛为研究区,利用2023年72景Sentinel-1A数据生成的干涉图提取对流层延迟;其次利用IGS站干延迟验证并校正InSAR干延迟;再次通过映射函数克服GNSS与InSAR观测几何差异对结果的影响;然后利用ERA5气象再分析资料计算研究区空间连续的水汽转换系数;最后利用探空站、IGS站PWV数据验证InSAR PWV反演的精度。结果表明,与探空站和IGS站PWV相比,InSAR PWV的平均偏差均小于0.71 mm,均方根误差均小于1.63 mm。通过GNSS对干延迟和水汽转换系数计算的质量控制,InSAR可以实现高精度、空间连续、纹理细致的大气水汽提取,为山区复杂地形区域的大气水汽监测打下基础。

关键词: GNSS, InSAR, 大气延迟, 大气可降水量, 水汽转换系数

Abstract: Aiming at solving the uncertain problems result from the various differences in the atmospheric water vapor inversion process between GNSS and InSAR techniques,this paper proposes a high-precision,spatially continuous atmospheric water vapor inversion method that integrates multi-source data from IGS,Sentinel-1,ERA5.Firstly,taking China's Taiwan Island as the study area,tropospheric delays are extracted from interferograms generated by Sentinel-1A data of 72 scenes in 2023.Secondly,InSAR dry delays are verified and corrected by IGS station dry delays.Then,the geometric differences between GNSS and InSAR observations are overcome by mapping functions.And then,spatial continuous water vapor conversion coefficients are calculated by ERA5 meteorological reanalysis data.Finally,the accuracy of InSAR PWV inversion is verified by sounding station and IGS station PWV data.The results indicate that compared with PWV measurements from sounding stations and IGS stations,the average deviation of InSAR PWV is less than 0.71 mm,and the root mean square error is less than 1.63 mm.By incorporating GNSS-based quality control in the calculation of dry delay and water vapor conversion coefficients,InSAR enables high-precision,spatially continuous,and finely detailed atmospheric water vapor retrieval,thereby establishing a foundation for monitoring atmospheric water vapor distribution in mountainous regions with complex terrain.

Key words: GNSS, InSAR, atmospheric delay, precipitable water vapor, water vapor conversion factor

中图分类号:

P237

周磊, 李德伟, 李晓红, 狄桂栓. 联合IGS、Sentinel-1、ERA5多源数据的中国台湾岛大气水汽反演[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(2): 38-45.

ZHOU Lei, LI Dewei, LI Xiaohong, DI Guishuan. Atmospheric water vapor retrieval over China's Taiwan Island using combined IGS/Sentinel-1/ERA5 multi-source data[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2026, 0(2): 38-45.

参考文献

[1] 邓南山,刘洋,李小伟,等.基于北斗/GNSS PWV数据构建的短临强降雨模型及其应用[J].测绘通报,2024(9):96-100.
[2] 姚欢欢,党亚民,许长辉,等.不同气候类型北斗反演大气可降水量性能分析[J].测绘科学,2022,47(10):21-28.
[3] YU Chen,PENNA N T,LI Zhenhong.Generation of real-time mode high-resolution water vapor fields from GPS observations[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres,2017,122(3):2008-2025.
[4] CARDELLACH E,RIUS A.A new technique to sense non-Gaussian features of the sea surface from L-band bi-static GNSS reflections[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2008,112(6):2927-2937.
[5] YAO Yibin,SUN Zhangyu,XU Chaoqian.Applicability of bevis formula at different height levels and global weighted mean temperature model based on near-earth atmospheric temperature[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science,2020,3(1):1-11.
[6] 姚宜斌,赵庆志.GNSS对流层水汽监测研究进展与展望[J].测绘学报,2022,51(6):935-952.
[7] ZHAO Yuling,ZHANG Ce,WANG Shuaimin,et al.Trends in precipitable water vapor in North America based on GNSS observation and ERA5 reanalysis[J].Climate Dynamics,2025,63(2):94.
[8] MATEUS P,TOMÉ R,NICO G,et al.Three-dimensional variational assimilation of InSAR PWV using the WRFDA model[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2016,54(12):7323-7330.
[9] 赵庆志,马智,姚宜斌,等.GNSS辅助风云三号卫星MERSI近红外通道的大气可降水量反演方法[J].测绘学报,2024,53(2):306-320.
[10] ALSHAWAF F,HINZ S,MAYER M,et al.Constructing accurate maps of atmospheric water vapor by combining interferometric synthetic aperture radar and GNSS observations[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres,2015,120(4):1391-1403.
[11] 唐伟,廖明生,张丽,等.基于全球气象再分析资料的InSAR对流层延迟改正研究[J].地球物理学报,2017,60(2):527-540.
[12] GUO Qiuying,YU Miao,LI Dewei,et al.Retrieval of high-precision precipitable water vapour maps using Sentinel-1A and BeiDou satellite data[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2023,44(22):7085-7105.
[13] MATSUZAWA K,KINOSHITA Y.Error evaluation of L-band InSAR precipitable water vapor measurements by comparison with GNSS observations in Japan[J].Remote Sensing,2021,13(23):4866.
[14] GUO Qiuying,YU Miao,LI Dewei,et al.An optimized framework for precipitable water vapor mapping using TS-InSAR and GNSS[J].Atmosphere,2023,14(11):1674.
[15] HANSSEN R F,WECKWERTH T M,ZEBKER H A,et al.High-resolution water vapor mapping from interferometric radar measurements[J].Science,1999,283(5406):1297-1299.
[16] 郭秋英,黄守凯,李德伟,等.哨兵1号的对流层湿延迟变化提取与分析[J].导航定位学报,2023,11(2):203-210.
[17] 孟昊霆,张克非,杨震,等.GPT2/GPT2w+Saastamoinen模型ZTD估计的亚洲地区精度分析[J].测绘科学,2020,45(8):70-76.
[18] BEVIS M,CHISWELL S,BUSINGER S,et al.Estimating wet delays using numerical weather analyses and predictions[J].Radio Science,1996,31(3):477-487.
[19] BOEHM J,KOUBA J,SCHUH H.Forecast Vienna mapping functions 1 for real-time analysis of space geodetic observations[J].Journal of Geodesy,2009,83(5):397-401.
[20] VÁZQUEZ B G E,GREJNER-BRZEZINSKA D A.GPS-PWV estimation and validation with radiosonde data and numerical weather prediction model in Antarctica[J].GPS Solutions,2013,17(1):29-39.

联合IGS、Sentinel-1、ERA5多源数据的中国台湾岛大气水汽反演

Atmospheric water vapor retrieval over China's Taiwan Island using combined IGS/Sentinel-1/ERA5 multi-source data

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈元非, 王磊. 基于SBAS-InSAR和水准数据融合的采动沉陷盆地边界稳健识别方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(2): 60-67.
[2]	王迎春, 李金超, 王承志, 李水平, 陶庭叶. 基于新型国产陆探一号SAR卫星的合肥市地表沉降特征[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(2): 149-155,173.
[3]	林羊, 于冰, 田馨, 张冠军, 刘成, 甘俊, 李广宇. 京雄城际铁路沿线InSAR地表沉降监测与影响因素分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(2): 46-53.
[4]	周子健, 徐晓磊, 宾元岑, 封博卿, 杨美皓, 刘唯佳. 复杂场景下智能手机GNSS定位因子图优化方法及性能分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(2): 87-91.
[5]	李鹏豪, 李爱国, 张诗玉. 基于SBAS与DS-SBAS的小浪底库区沉降监测对比[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(2): 12-17.
[6]	苏卫江, 孙留存, 肖文星, 高永强, 贺文, 廖丹, 解明礼. 不同轨道InSAR滑坡隐患识别结果差异性分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(1): 78-84.
[7]	曹芮菡, 李新, 周定杰, 喜文飞, 黄广才, 王瑞亭, 郭蓁. 联合ALOS-2和Sentinel-1的复杂山区潜在滑坡识别[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(1): 65-71.
[8]	韦宇辉, 刘先林, 邵羽, 董秀军, 黎浩良. 山区公路地质灾害早期识别与监测预警方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(1): 91-99.
[9]	李朋朋, 李德伟, 李晓红, 翟雪君. 基于InSAR同震形变的地震灾害风险评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(1): 39-46.
[10]	刘艺梁, 李永奕, 朱前, 左清军, 樊西丰, 宋琨, 申高伟, 汤罗圣. 基于时序InSAR与BiGRU的库岸滑坡形变分析与预测[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(1): 51-56.
[11]	骆晓亮, 刘凌佳, 罗津, 王绿春, 余伟, 罗赣, 高华. 面向Web应用的海量InSAR点云高效可视化与查询方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(1): 135-139.
[12]	李景洮, 张双成, 盛磊, 张毅, 强菲, 聂腾, 刘宁, 闻繁. 时序InSAR与普适型GNSS用于西安地面沉降监测研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2026, 0(1): 18-24,46.
[13]	张永利, 朱文超, 范业稳, 曲直. 面向新型测绘产品质检用数据获取的GNSS辅助无人机航摄技术[J]. 测绘通报, 2025, 0(8): 153-158.
[14]	莫丹丹, 火久元. 基于SBAS-InSAR技术的喀喇昆仑公路盖孜河谷段形变监测与影响因子分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2025, 0(8): 32-42.
[15]	李若凡, 李勇发, 左小清, 黄成, 邢明泽, 李永宁, 张荐铭, 石超, 顾晓娜. 兰坪县InSAR形变监测与滑坡灾害早期识别[J]. 测绘通报, 2025, 0(7): 40-45.