测绘通报 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (9): 96-102.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2018.0288

• 技术交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市地址模型概念框架的关键问题

张志军1, 邱俊武1, 亢孟军2, 毛海辰3   

  1. 1. 天津市测绘院, 天津 300381;
    2. 武汉大学资源与环境科学学院, 湖北 武汉 430079;
    3. 灵宝市水利局, 河南 灵宝 472500
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-09 出版日期:2018-09-25 发布日期:2018-09-29
  • 作者简介:张志军(1983-),男,博士,高级工程师,研究方向为智慧城市和数据可视化。E-mail:zhangzhijun@whu.edu.cn

Key Issues of Conceptual Framework for Urban Address Model in China

ZHANG Zhijun1, QIU Junwu1, KANG Mengjun2, MAO Haichen3   

  1. 1. Tianjin Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Tianjin 300381, China;
    2. School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
    3. Water Conservancy Bureau of Lingbao, Lingbao 472500, China
  • Received:2017-11-09 Online:2018-09-25 Published:2018-09-29

摘要:

地址是空间信息的自然语言形式表达,是空间数据基础设施的重要组成部分。由于城市地址规划的相对落后,大量不规范的城市地址数据进入基础空间信息数据库,严重影响了空间数据的质量和服务功能。本文对城市地址模型概念框架涉及的核心问题进行了讨论,包括地址的相关定义、地址和地理要素的指代关系、地址的管理机构及我国地址标准化的现状,从而为进一步的城市地址相关研究提供了新的思路。

关键词: 城市地址模型, 地址, 地理编码, 地址标准化, 空间信息传递

Abstract:

As a natural language form of place location,address plays an important role in spatial data infrastructure.In China,large amount of non-standard address data is collected and stored into spatial database to provide data services to organizations result from the relative backwardness of urban planning.These address data reduce the data quality of spatial data infrastructure severely.In this paper,some key issues of conceptual framework for urban address model is discussed,such as the definition of address,the relationship between addresses and geographical features,the better choice of organization who can charge address management and the development situation of address standardization in China.Some new ideas are expected to provide for further research on urban address based on the results of this paper.

Key words: urban address model, address definition, geocoding, address standardization, spatial communication

中图分类号: