利用Sentinel-2A多光谱成像仪与Landsat 8陆地成像仪影像进行普陀山岛植被分类效果比较

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0326

测绘通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (10): 97-100.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0326

利用Sentinel-2A多光谱成像仪与Landsat 8陆地成像仪影像进行普陀山岛植被分类效果比较

章晓洁, 邓艳芬, 张亚超, 蒋芸芸, 邱桔斐

国家海洋局东海海洋环境调查勘察中心, 上海 200137

收稿日期:2019-02-01 出版日期:2019-10-25 发布日期:2019-10-26
通讯作者: 邱桔斐。E-mail:qjf@ecs.mnr.gov.cn E-mail:qjf@ecs.mnr.gov.cn
作者简介:章晓洁(1989-),女,博士,工程师,主要从事海洋遥感及测绘研究。E-mail:zhxj@ecs.mnr.gov.cn
基金资助:
海洋公益性行业科研专项（201505009）；国家海洋局东海分局青年科技基金（201609）

Comparison of vegetation classification performances on Putuoshan island using Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat 8 OLI images

ZHANG Xiaojie, DENG Yanfen, ZHANG Yachao, JIANG Yunyun, QIU Jufei

East Sea Marine Environmantal Investigating & Surveying Center, SOA China, Shanghai 200137, China

Received:2019-02-01 Online:2019-10-25 Published:2019-10-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 卫星遥感技术可用于海岛资源调查。Sentinel-2A与Landsat 8两颗卫星都可免费提供空间分辨率较高的多光谱遥感影像，在海岛调查中的应用潜力较大。本文以浙江舟山普陀山岛为例开展了针对这两种影像在海岛植被分类中的应用效果的研究，分别利用Sentinel-2A多光谱成像仪（MSI）和Landsat 8陆地成像仪（OLI）影像基于最大似然法分类获得了该岛阔叶林、针阔混交林、针叶林、灌丛、草丛等植被及其他地物的分布情况，并进行了精度检验，结果表明MSI的总体分类精度略高于OLI。

关键词: Sentinel-2A, Landsat 8, 遥感植被分类, 最大似然法, 总体分类精度

Abstract: Satellite remote sensing technique can be used to investigate resources of sea-islands. Both Sentinel-2A and Landsat 8 satellites freely provide multi-spectral remote sensing images with relatively high spatial resolution which means high potential of sea-island investigation. Taking Putuoshan island, Zhoushan, Zhejiang as example, vegetation classifications on sea-island using images of these two satellites are compared. Based on maximum likelihood classification method, classes of broad-leaved forest, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, coniferous forest, shrub, grassland and other land uses are extracted respectively using Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat 8 OLI images. And accuracy validation results show that the overall classification accuracy of MSI is a little higher than that of OLI.

Key words: Sentinel-2A, Landsat 8, remote sensing vegetation classification, maximum likelihood, overall classification accuracy

中图分类号:

P237

章晓洁, 邓艳芬, 张亚超, 蒋芸芸, 邱桔斐. 利用Sentinel-2A多光谱成像仪与Landsat 8陆地成像仪影像进行普陀山岛植被分类效果比较[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(10): 97-100.

ZHANG Xiaojie, DENG Yanfen, ZHANG Yachao, JIANG Yunyun, QIU Jufei. Comparison of vegetation classification performances on Putuoshan island using Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat 8 OLI images[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(10): 97-100.

参考文献 15

[1]	冯文卿, 眭海刚, 涂继辉, 等. 高分辨率遥感影像的随机森林变化检测方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(11):1880-1890.
[2]	董士伟. 林地信息提取与精度评价空间抽样方法研究[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(10):1428.
[3]	周晓敏, 郑南山, 祁云, 等. 利用GPS-R遥感技术反演植被生物量[J]. 测绘通报, 2018(1):129-132.
[4]	MICIJEVIC E, HAQUE M O. Effects of spectral band differences between Landsat 8 operational land imager (OLI) and Sentinel 2A multispectral instrument (MSI)[C]//American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2015. San Francisco:[s.n.], 2015.
[5]	MICIJEVIC E, HAQUE M O. Radiometric comparison between Sentinel 2A(S2A) Multispectral Imager (MSI) and Landsat 8(L8) operational land imager (OLI)[C]//American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2016. San Francisco:[s.n.], 2016.
[6]	MALLINIS G, MITSOPOULOS I, CHRYSAFI I. Evaluating and comparing Sentinel 2A and Landsat-8 operational land imager (OLI) spectral indices for estimating fire severity in a Mediterranean pine ecosystem of Greece[J]. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2018, 55(1):1-18.
[7]	FLOOD N. Comparing Sentinel-2A and Landsat 7 and 8 using surface reflectance over Australia[J]. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(7):659.
[8]	KORHONEN L, HADI, PACKALEN P, et al. Comparison of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 in the estimation of boreal forest canopy cover and leaf area index[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 195:259-274.
[9]	ZHANG H K, ROY D P, YAN L, et al. Characterization of Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 top of atmosphere, surface, and nadir BRDF adjusted reflectance and NDVI differences[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 215:482-494.
[10]	FÜLÖP G. Performance of Sentinel-2 data in unsupervised classification:a case study of statistical comparison with Landsat 8 OLI[J]. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 2016, 7(1):1-12.
[11]	安霞霞, 杨广斌, 许元红, 等. 喀斯特山区居民地多尺度遥感信息提取精度对比[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017,36(4):501-511.
[12]	胡军飞, 许洺山, 田文斌, 等. 浙江普陀山主要林型群落结构特征分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(5):768-777.
[13]	杜靖媛, 葛宏立, 路伟, 等. 基于Fisher判别的层次分类法的森林遥感影像分类[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2017,37(4):175-182.
[14]	郭交, 朱琳, 靳标. 基于Sentinel-1和Sentinel-2数据融合的农作物分类[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018,49(4):192-198.
[15]	RODRIGUEZ-GALIANO V F, CHICA-OLMO M, ABARCA-HERNANDEZ F, et al. Random forest classification of Mediterranean land cover using multi-seasonal imagery and multi-seasonal texture[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012,121:93-107.

利用Sentinel-2A多光谱成像仪与Landsat 8陆地成像仪影像进行普陀山岛植被分类效果比较

Comparison of vegetation classification performances on Putuoshan island using Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat 8 OLI images

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 15

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王春霞, 张俊, 李屹旭, 范成成. 一种基于Landsat 8的多波段组合水体指数模型[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(5): 20-25.
[2]	王刚, 丁华祥. Sentinel-2A数据支持下的雷州半岛植被类型识别[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(3): 76-82.
[3]	王晓晓, 韩留生, 杨骥, 李勇, 张大富, 孙广伟, 范俊甫. Sentinel-2与Landsat 8数据组合下的多特征冬小麦面积提取[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(3): 111-115.
[4]	陶莉, 胡召玲. 利用Sentinel-2A数据提取长江中下游丘陵地带农作物种植信息[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(7): 39-43.
[5]	段雅鸣, 张锦水, 朱爽. 基于深度卷积神经网络的云检测方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(4): 33-39.
[6]	何佳君, 刘向铜, 涂梨平, 徐看, 何紫玲, 宋昊航, 刘欢. 南昌地区不透水面信息自动提取[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(8): 1-4.
[7]	张宏涛, 黄宏胜, 魏康宁, 钟海燕. 基于面向对象与规则的Sentinel-2A影像土地覆被分类——以江西省都昌县为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(6): 111-117.
[8]	刘金丽, 陈钊. Landsat 8多光谱数据辅助下的高分影像多尺度分割[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(9): 38-43.
[9]	梅树红, 范城城, 廖永生, 李雅然, 施宇军, 麦超. 结合光谱和纹理特征的林地变更检测[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(8): 140-143.
[10]	肖祥红, 刘海洋, 郭云开. 基于混合像元分解理论的路域植被等量水厚度遥感反演[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(12): 83-86,95.
[11]	周峻松, 李石华. 2012-2015年中缅油气管道重要节点土地利用/覆被时空变化分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(3): 113-116.