城乡生态质量对经济快速增长区建设用地扩张的响应——以合肥为例

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0232

测绘通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 54-60.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0232

城乡生态质量对经济快速增长区建设用地扩张的响应——以合肥为例

王建^1,2,3, 苏涛^1,2,3, 朱菲^1,2,3, 夏俊^1,2,3, 廖晋一^1,2,3

1. 安徽理工大学空间信息与测绘工程学院, 安徽淮南 232001;
2. 安徽理工大学矿山采动灾害空天地协同监测与预警安徽普通高校重点实验室, 安徽淮南 232001;
3. 安徽理工大学矿区环境与灾害协同监测煤炭行业工程研究中心, 安徽淮南 232001

收稿日期:2021-11-23 发布日期:2022-09-01
通讯作者: 苏涛。E-mail:st7162003@163.com
作者简介:王建(1997-),男,硕士生,研究方向为生态环境遥感。E-mail:194637318@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFC0407703);安徽理工大学引进人才科研启动项目(ZY030);安徽理工大学2021年研究生创新基金(2021CX2139)

The response of urban and rural ecological quality to the expansion of construction land in rapid economic growth zone: taking Hefei as an enample

WANG Jian^1,2,3, SU Tao^1,2,3, ZHU Fei^1,2,3, XIA Jun^1,2,3, LIAO Jinyi^1,2,3

1. School of Spatial Informatics and Geomatics Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Aviation-aerospace-ground Cooperative Monitoring and Early Warning of Coal Mining-induced Disasters of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China;
3. Coal Industry Engineering Research Center of Mining Area Environmental and Disaster Cooperative Monitoring, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China

Received:2021-11-23 Published:2022-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 21世纪以来,中国经济增长促进了城市化进程的快速发展,也在一定程度上带来一系列环境问题。本文以合肥为例,选用2002、2010、2020年的Landsat系列影像,利用改进的遥感生态指数(MRSEI),并引入城市扩张强度、城市重心转移模型等,探讨了城乡生态变化对建设用地扩张的响应。结果表明:2002—2020年合肥市主城区与周边乡镇生态环境质量总体呈恶化趋势,其中周边乡镇MRSEI均值由2002年的0.747下降至2020年的0.495,降幅为33.7%,主城区MRSEI均值由2002年的0.669下降至2020年的0.491,降幅为28.73%;周边乡镇生态质量下降幅度高于主城区,建设用地扩张强度大于主城区,生态破损更为严重。生态环境恶化区域主要由主城区向周边乡镇放射性分布,生态环境变好的区域主要集中在老城区周围,而城市扩张的区域与MRSEI评价结果显示的生态环境恶化区域基本重合,生态环境变化与城市建设用地扩张强度呈明显的负相关关系。

关键词: 建设用地扩张, MRSEI, 生态质量, 合肥, 扩张强度

Abstract: Since the 21st century, China's economic growth has promoted the rapid development of urbanization, but also brings a series of environmental problems to a certain extent. Taking Hefei in Anhui province, one of the fast economic-developing in the Yangtze River Delta region, as a study area, based on Landsat images of 2002, 2010 and 2020, this paper discusses the response of urban and rural ecological changes to the expansion of construction land by using improved remote sensing ecological index and introducing urban expansion intensity and urban center of gravity center displacement model. The results show that: From 2002 to 2020, the ecological environment quality of the main urban area and surrounding towns of Hefei show a general deteriorating trend. The average MRSEI of surrounding towns decreases from 0.747 in 2002 to 0.495 in 2020, a decrease of 33.7%. The average MRSEI of the main urban area decreases from 0.669 in 2002 to 0.491 in 2020, a decrease of 28.73%. The decline in the ecological quality of surrounding towns is higher than that of the main urban area, the expansion of construction land is stronger than that of the main urban area, and the ecological damage is more serious. The deteriorating ecological environment is mainly distributed radially from the main urban area to the surrounding towns. The areas with improved ecological environment are mainly distributed around the old urban area. The areas of urban expansion and the deteriorating ecological environment shown by the MRSEI evaluation results basically coincide, and the ecological environment changes have a obviously negative correlation with the expansion intensity of urban construction land.

Key words: construction land expansion, MRSEI, ecological quality, Hefei, extension strength

中图分类号:

P237

王建, 苏涛, 朱菲, 夏俊, 廖晋一. 城乡生态质量对经济快速增长区建设用地扩张的响应——以合肥为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(8): 54-60.

WANG Jian, SU Tao, ZHU Fei, XIA Jun, LIAO Jinyi. The response of urban and rural ecological quality to the expansion of construction land in rapid economic growth zone: taking Hefei as an enample[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(8): 54-60.

参考文献

[1] LANARI R,ZENI G,MANUNTA M,et al.An integrated SAR/GIS approach for investigating urban deformation phenomena:a case study of the city of Naples,Italy[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2004,25(14):2855-2867.
[2] 吕志强.快速城市化背景下的建设用地扩张类型格局及驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):65-71.
[3] LIN Tao,GE Rubing,HUANG Jie,et al.A quantitative method to assess the ecological indicator system's effectiveness:a case study of the ecological province construction indicators of China[J].Ecological Indicators,2016,62:95-100.
[4] 徐涵秋.基于城市地表参数变化的城市热岛效应分析[J].生态学报,2011,31(14):3890-3901.
[5] 任鹏飞,甘淑,谢显奇,等.基于ETM⁺遥感探测山地城市不透水面及其动态分析[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(5):109-112.
[6] 李卓,孙然好,张继超,等.京津冀城市群地区植被覆盖动态变化时空分析[J].生态学报,2017,37(22):7418-7426.
[7] ZHANG Jinqu,ZHU Yunqiang,FAN Fenglei.Mapping and evaluation of landscape ecological status using geographic indices extracted from remote sensing imagery of the Pearl River Delta,China,between 1998 and 2008[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2016,75(4):327.
[8] 姚尧,王世新,周艺,等.生态环境状况指数模型在全国生态环境质量评价中的应用[J].遥感信息,2012,27(3):93-98.
[9] 徐涵秋.城市遥感生态指数的创建及其应用[J].生态学报,2013,33(24):7853-7862.
[10] 宋美杰,罗艳云,段利民.基于改进遥感生态指数模型的锡林郭勒草原生态环境评价[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(6):1521-1527.
[11] ZENG Chao,SHEN Huanfeng,ZHANG Liangpei.Recovering missing pixels for Landsat ETM+ SLC-off imagery using multi-temporal regression analysis and a regularization method[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2013,131:182-194.
[12] GOWARD S N,XUE Yongkang,CZAJKOWSKI K P.Evaluating land surface moisture conditions from the remotely sensed temperature/vegetation index measurements[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2002,79(2/3):225-242.
[13] TODD S,HOFFER R.Responses of spectral indices to variations in vegetation cover and soil background[J].Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,1998,64(9):915-922.
[14] CHANDER G,MARKHAM B L,HELDER D L.Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS,TM,ETM+,and EO-1 ALI sensors[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2009,113(5):893-903.
[15] XU H.A new index for delineating built-up land features in satellite imagery[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2008,29(14):4269-4276.
[16] RIKIMARU A,ROY P,MIYATAKE S.Tropical forest cover density mapping [J].Tropical Ecology,2002,43(1):39-47.
[17] 徐涵秋.利用改进的归一化差异水体指数(MNDWI)提取水体信息的研究[J].遥感学报,2005,9(5):589-595.
[18] 吴小君,方秀琴,苗月鲜,等.基于Landsat的合肥市城市扩张研究[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2017,44(6):631-639.
[19] 约日古丽卡斯木,孜比布拉·司马义,王蕾,等.新疆博乐市生态环境变化对城市建设用地扩张的响应[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(1):252-259.
[20] 施婷婷,徐涵秋,唐菲.经济快速增长区建筑用地变化及其对生态质量的影响:以福建晋江为例[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(4):1317-1325.
[21] 王雪微,王士君,宋飏,等.长春市城市建设用地演进的空间识别及影响机制研究[J].地理科学,2015,35(7):873-881.
[22] 许有为.合肥城市建设的人文历史定位[J].当代建设,2003(6):5-6.

城乡生态质量对经济快速增长区建设用地扩张的响应——以合肥为例

The response of urban and rural ecological quality to the expansion of construction land in rapid economic growth zone: taking Hefei as an enample

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈震, 李少帅, 陈建平. 土地生态质量遥感空间分异与主控因子研究——以广安市为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(9): 94-99.
[2]	符彦, 王剑辉, 张亚. 基于多源数据的城市建设用地扩张时空特征分析——以佛山市顺德区为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(8): 111-115.
[3]	任家锋, 马卫春, 任程程. 合肥市城市发展质量空间计量分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(10): 126-130.