平原地区机载激光雷达数据的抽稀算法分析

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0021

测绘通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 101-107.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0021

平原地区机载激光雷达数据的抽稀算法分析

杨明军¹, 苏春梅², 康冰锋¹, 张珣¹, 曹殿才³

1. 中科遥感科技集团有限公司, 天津 300384;
2. 国家测绘地理信息局重庆测绘院, 重庆 401120;
3. 吉林省航测遥感院, 吉林长春 130051

收稿日期:2018-07-09 修回日期:2018-11-13 出版日期:2019-01-25 发布日期:2019-02-14
作者简介:杨明军(1985-),男,工程师,主要从事航空摄影、地理信息方面生产及项目管理工作。E-mail:mjyang-gis@163.com

Study and application on thinning algorithm of airborne LiDAR data in plain area

YANG Mingjun¹, SU Chunmei², KANG Bingfeng¹, ZHANG Xun¹, CAO Diancai³

1. ChinaRS Geo-informatics Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300384, China;
2. Chongqing Institute of Surveying and Mapping, NASG, Chongqing 401120, China;
3. Jilin Institute of Airborne Survey and Remote Sensing, Changchun 130051, China

Received:2018-07-09 Revised:2018-11-13 Online:2019-01-25 Published:2019-02-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前，机载激光雷达点云数据在测绘行业中的应用还存在较多的瓶颈。为了使机载激光雷达点云数据更好地服务等值线等数据的生产，发挥其高效和高精度的优势，本文归纳、总结了国内外现有的LiDAR点云数据抽稀算法，并通过对比分析现有LiDAR点云数据抽稀算法存在的优缺点，如系统抽稀、格网抽稀、TIN抽稀和坡度抽稀等算法，结合平原地区激光点云在实际生产中的应用，研究了更适合平原地区点云数据的抽稀方法，通过大量的数据测试和试生产。结果表明，该方法可以在应用项目精度约束下保证数据质量，减少了后期数据处理应用的难度，提升了后续成果数据的质量，提高了作业生产效率，对机载激光雷达点云数据在测绘行业中的应用推广具有重要的现实意义。

关键词: 机载激光雷达, 平原地区, 抽稀算法, 约束TIN抽稀法, 等值线

Abstract: At present, there are still many bottlenecks in the application of airborne LiDAR point cloud data in the surveying and mapping industry. In order to make airborne LiDAR point cloud data better serve the production of equivalent data, and give play to its advantages of high efficiency and high precision. In this paper, we summarize the existing algorithm of cloud data thinning in LiDAR at home and abroad, and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the existing algorithm, such as system thinning, grid thinning, TIN thinning and slope thinning. Based on the application of laser point cloud in actual production in plain area, the method of thinning data more suitable for plain area is studied. Through a lot of data testing and trial production, the results show that this method can guarantee data quality under the constraints of application project accuracy. It reduces the difficulty of late data processing, improves the quality of the follow-up data, and improves the efficiency of the operation. It has a very important practical significance for the application and promotion of airborne Lidar cloud data in the surveying and mapping industry.

Key words: airborne laser radar, plain country, thinning algorithm, constrained TIN thinning method, contour line

中图分类号:

P237

杨明军, 苏春梅, 康冰锋, 张珣, 曹殿才. 平原地区机载激光雷达数据的抽稀算法分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(1): 101-107.

YANG Mingjun, SU Chunmei, KANG Bingfeng, ZHANG Xun, CAO Diancai. Study and application on thinning algorithm of airborne LiDAR data in plain area[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(1): 101-107.

参考文献

[1] AGARWAL P K, ARGE L, DANNER A. From point cloud to grid DEM:a scalable approach[C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. Zurich:[s. n.], 2006:771-788.
[2] HAMMOUDI K,DORNAIKA F,SOHEILIAN B, et al. Extracting wire-frame models of street facades from 3D joint clouds and the corresponding cadastral map[J]. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2010, 38(3A):91-96.
[3] 郭波,黄先锋,张帆,等.顾及空间上下文关系的Joint-Boost点云分类及特征降维[J].测绘学报,2013,42(5):715-721.
[4] 邹长江,马洪超,张良,等.机载LIDAR点云时间纹理信息航带重叠区消冗[J].遥感学报,2014,18(6):1208-1216.
[5] LIU X, ZHANG Z, PETERSON J, et al. The effect of LiDAR data density on DEM accuracy[C]//Proceedings of the International Congress on Modelling & Simulation, Christchurch. New Zealand:[s.n.], 2007:1363-1369.
[6] 张小红.机载激光雷达测量技术理论与方法[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007:9-14.
[7] ANDERSON E S,THOMPSON J A, AUSTIN R E, et al. LiDAR density and linear interpolator effects on elevation estimates[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2005, 26(18):3889-3900.
[8] 蔡先华,郑天栋.数字高程模型数据压缩及算法研究[J].测绘通报,2003(12):16-18.
[9] 徐景中, 万幼川, 张圣望. LiDAR地面点云的简化方法研究[J]. 测绘信息与工程, 2008,33(1):32-34.
[10] GAO J L. 2D and 3D surface image processing algorithms and their application[D]. New Jersey:New Jersey Institute of Technology, 2001:17-18.
[11] 缪志修,齐华,王国昌,等.基于机载LiDAR数据构建的DEM抽稀算法研究[J].铁道勘察,2010(4):35-40.
[12] 刘春,吴杭彬.基于平面不规则三角网的DEM数据压缩与质量分析[J].中国图象图形学报,2007,12(5):836-840.
[13] 缪志修.基于机载LiDAR数据的DEM抽稀算法研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2010:24-28.
[14] PAMELA S. A data density education algorithm for post-processed air-borne LiDAR bathymetric survey data[D]. Florida:University of Florida, 2000.
[15] 杜浩,朱俊锋,张力,等. 顾及地形特征的LiDAR点云数据抽稀算法[J].测绘科学,2016,41(9):140-146.
[16] CHOU Y H,LIU P S,DEZZANI R J.Terrain complexity and reduction of topographic data[J].Geographical Systems, 1999,1(2):179-197.
[17] 胡诚.精度约束下地表LiDAR点云抽稀方法研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2015:71-76.
[18] SONG H, FENG H Y. A point cloud simplification algorithm for mechanical part inspection[C]//Information Technology for Balanced Manufacturing Systems. Boston, MA:Springer, 2006:461-468.
[19] 周启鸣,刘学军.数字地形分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:217-219.

平原地区机载激光雷达数据的抽稀算法分析

Study and application on thinning algorithm of airborne LiDAR data in plain area

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王道杰, 陈倍, 孙健辉. 机载LiDAR点云密度对DEM精度的影响[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(5): 140-144,169.
[2]	高胜超, 高彦涛, 王文杰. 机载LiDAR在河南省重点水库库区高精度DEM建立中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(1): 128-132.
[3]	李德友, 李彩林, 李祥珅, 王柏涛. 激光雷达点云电力线自动提取算法[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(6): 33-38.
[4]	张鹏, 马庆勋, 吕杰, 季金亮, 李紫微. 机器学习算法在森林地上生物量估算中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(12): 28-32.
[5]	吉绪发. 旋翼无人机载激光雷达在农村不动产权籍调查中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(7): 152-155,158.
[6]	周钦坤, 岳建平, 杨恒, 朱依民. 机载LiDAR数据中电力线的自动提取与重建[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(10): 26-30,37.
[7]	胡耀锋, 胡欣然. 基于LiDAR的城市坐标系精度评估及应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(10): 101-105.
[8]	王艳军, 李凯, 路立娟. 多尺度邻域特征下的机载LiDAR点云电力线分类[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(4): 21-25.
[9]	朱依民, 田林亚, 毕继鑫, 林松. 基于机载LiDAR数据的建筑物轮廓提取[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(12): 65-70.
[10]	彭劲松, 许俊, 李娟, 周光明. 机载激光测量系统在地质灾害中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(9): 160-162.
[11]	王刊生, 郑亮. 一种无人机影像空三加密点抽稀算法[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(3): 108-112.
[12]	郑佳荣, 崔有祯, 桂维振, 崔哲. 建筑物加载过程中高精度变形监测研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2017, 0(9): 96-99.
[13]	郑佳荣, 崔有祯, 刘俞含. 斜距归算成水平距离误差定量分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2017, 0(2): 95-97.
[14]	于彩霞, 许军, 许坚, 郑义东, 李改肖. 一种从LiDAR点云中提取海岸线的新方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2015, 0(5): 66-68.
[15]	胡耀锋, 张志媛, 林鸿. 利用机载LiDAR测绘大比例尺数字地形图的可行性研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2015, 0(5): 87-90.