基于不同斜坡单元划分方法和BP神经网络的泥石流易发性评价

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0234

测绘通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 68-74.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0234

基于不同斜坡单元划分方法和BP神经网络的泥石流易发性评价

李坤^1,2,3, 赵俊三^1,2,3, 林伊琳^1,2,3, 周豹^1,2,3

1. 昆明理工大学国土资源工程学院, 云南昆明 650093;
2. 智慧矿山地理空间信息集成创新重点实验室, 云南昆明 650093;
3. 云南省高校自然资源空间信息集成与应用科技创新团队, 云南昆明 650211

收稿日期:2021-11-01 发布日期:2022-09-01
通讯作者: 林伊琳。E-mail:601960754@qq.com
作者简介:李坤(1996-),男,硕士生,主要研究方向为GIS开发与应用、灾害地质。E-mail:2378842227@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41761081);昆明理工大学引进人才科研启动基金(KKZ3202021055)

Assessment of debris flow susceptibility based on different slope unit division methods and BP neural network

LI Kun^1,2,3, ZHAO Junsan^1,2,3, LIN Yilin^1,2,3, ZHOU Bao^1,2,3

1. Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Geospatial Information Integration Innovation for Smart Mines, Kunming 650093, China;
3. Spatial Information Integration Technology of Natural Resources in Universities of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650211, China

Received:2021-11-01 Published:2022-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取合适的评价单元是泥石流易发性评价的关键,为探索斜坡单元不同划分方法对泥石流易发性评价结果的影响,本文以泥石流多发地东川区为例,对比分析了水文分析法和曲率分水岭法两种斜坡单元划分方法在泥石流易发性评价中的效果。首先在解译泥石流点的基础上,采用不同划分方法的斜坡单元作为评价单元,然后对初步选取的指标因子进行多重共线性和贡献率分析,以完善指标因子体系,最后构建基于BP神经网络的泥石流易发性评价模型。结果表明,泥石流极高和高易发区主要集中分布于研究区小江河谷和金沙江南岸,该地区地质环境脆弱,危险性较高。基于曲率分水岭法的易发性模型AUC值为0.865 8,高于水文分析法的0.815 3,表明采用曲率分水岭法划分的斜坡单元更适用于研究区泥石流易发性评价。

关键词: 泥石流, 易发性评价, 斜坡单元划分, BP神经网络, 指标因子

Abstract: Selecting appropriate assessment units is the key to the assessment of debris flow susceptibility. In order to explore the impact of different methods of slope unit division on the assessment results of debris flow susceptibility. Taking Dongchuan district as an example, this paper compares and analyzes the effects of two slope unit division methods: hydrological analysis method and curvature watershed method in the evaluation of debris flow susceptibility. Based on the interpretation of debris flow points, the slope units with different division methods are used as the assessment unit, and the preliminary selected index factors are analyzed for multicollinearity and contribution rate to improve the index factor system, and finally build the debris flow susceptibility evaluation model based on BP neural network. The results show that the very high and high susceptibility areas of debris flow are mainly distributed in the Xiaojiang river valley and the south bank of Jinsha river in the study area, where the geological environment is fragile and the risk is high; The AUC value of the susceptibility model based on the curvature watershed method is 0.8658, which is higher than that of the hydrological analysis method of 0.8153, indicating that the slope unit divided by the curvature watershed method is more suitable for debris flow susceptibility assessment in the study area.

Key words: debris flow, susceptibility assessment, slope unit division, BP neural network, index factor

中图分类号:

P208

李坤, 赵俊三, 林伊琳, 周豹. 基于不同斜坡单元划分方法和BP神经网络的泥石流易发性评价[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(8): 68-74.

LI Kun, ZHAO Junsan, LIN Yilin, ZHOU Bao. Assessment of debris flow susceptibility based on different slope unit division methods and BP neural network[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(8): 68-74.

参考文献

[1] 张晨,王清,陈剑平,等.金沙江流域泥石流的组合赋权法危险度评价[J].岩土力学,2011,32(3):831-836.
[2] 陈鹏宇,乔景顺,彭祖武,等.基于等级相关的泥石流危险因子筛选与危险度评价[J].岩土力学,2013,34(5):1409￣1415.
[3] 赵晓燕,谈树成,李永平.基于斜坡单元与组合赋权法的东川区地质灾害危险性评价[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,43(2):299-305.
[4] 周超,殷坤龙,曹颖,等.基于集成学习与径向基神经网络耦合模型的三峡库区滑坡易发性评价[J].地球科学,2020,45(6):1865-1876.
[5] YU Lanbing,CAO Ying,ZHOU Chao,et al.Landslide susceptibility mapping combining information gain ratio and support vector machines:a case study from Wushan segment in the Three Gorges reservoir area,China[J].Applied Sciences,2019,9(22):4756.
[6] 田乃满,兰恒星,伍宇明,等.人工神经网络和决策树模型在滑坡易发性分析中的性能对比[J].地球信息科学学报,2020,22(12):2304-2316.
[7] 叶振南,田运涛,陈宗良,等.西藏芒康县斜坡地质灾害空间分布特征与易发性区划[J].自然灾害学报,2021,30(3):199-208.
[8] ZHANG Yonghong,GE Taotao,TIAN Wei,et al.Debris flow susceptibility mapping using machine-learning techniques in Shigatse area,China[J].Remote Sensing,2019,11(23):2801.
[9] XIONG Ke,ADHIKARI B R,STAMATOPOULOS C A,et al.Comparison of different machine learning methods for debris flow susceptibility mapping:a case study in the Sichuan province,China[J].Remote Sensing,2020,12(2):295.
[10] 黄启乐,陈伟,傅旭东.斜坡单元支持下区域泥石流危险性AHP-RBF评价模型[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2018,52(9):1667-1675.
[11] 张曦,陈丽霞,徐勇,等.两种斜坡单元划分方法对滑坡灾害易发性评价的对比研究[J].安全与环境工程,2018,25(1):12-17.
[12] CHEVALIER G G,MEDINA V,HÜRLIMANN M,et al.Debris-flow susceptibility analysis using fluvio-morphological parameters and data mining:application to the Central-Eastern Pyrenees[J].Natural Hazards,2013,67(2):213-238.
[13] 武雪玲,任福,牛瑞卿,等.斜坡单元支持下的滑坡易发性评价支持向量机模型[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2013,38(12):1499-1503.
[14] 李紫微,马庆勋,吕杰.BP神经网络的近地面臭氧估算及时空特征分析[J].测绘通报,2021(6):28-32.
[15] 龚旭,吕佳,皮家甜.结合信息增益率和K-means聚类的协同训练算法[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,37(2):112-119.
[16] LIANG Zhu,WANG Changming,ZHANG Zhimin,et al.A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for debris flow susceptibility mapping[J].Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2020,34(11):1887-1907.
[17] 李益敏,杨蕾,魏苏杭.基于小流域单元的怒江州泥石流易发性评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(10):2419-2428.

基于不同斜坡单元划分方法和BP神经网络的泥石流易发性评价

Assessment of debris flow susceptibility based on different slope unit division methods and BP neural network

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘璐, 罗年学, 赵前胜. 基于历史数据的黄海浒苔爆发规模预测[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 7-11.
[2]	强德霞, 马海政, 朱自平, 苟彦梅. 甘肃省积石山县泥石流空间分布及分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 107-111,117.
[3]	冯俊俊, 周立, 欧阳犬平, 周珍. 优化短期余水位组合预测模型[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(3): 96-100.
[4]	丁仁军, 王友昆, 张君华, 刘晨. 基于BP神经网络的昆明天顶湿延迟模型[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(3): 107-110.
[5]	毛斌, 韩文泉, 谢宏全, 吕海扬. 基于北京二号影像辅助nDSM的建筑物自动提取[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(3): 132-137.
[6]	李紫微, 马庆勋, 吕杰. BP神经网络的近地面臭氧估算及时空特征分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(6): 28-32,126.
[7]	祁于娜, 王磊. 层次分析-熵值定权法应用于山区城镇地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(6): 112-116.
[8]	宋宝, 柯福阳, 赵兴旺. 面向LiDAR/Radar松组合的迭代加权IEKF-BP组合算法精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(2): 44-48.
[9]	王旭清, 史彦新, 潘建永, 郭颖平, 高幼龙, 魏建朋. 泥石流灾害多发区生态环境遥感监测评价[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(11): 21-24.
[10]	鲁小红. 最优权组合预测法在采煤沉陷变形预测中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(4): 111-115.
[11]	郭云开, 许敏, 张晓炯, 刘雨玲. 结合PRO-4SAIL和BP神经网络的叶绿素含量高光谱反演[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(3): 21-24.
[12]	冯绍权, 花向红, 陶武勇, 宣伟, 吴伟, 续东. 一种基于GA-BP-MC神经网络的高铁桥墩沉降预测模型[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(7): 50-53,82.
[13]	周访滨, 邹联华, 张晓炯, 孟凡一. 栅格DEM微地形分类的BP神经网络法[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(10): 101-104,132.
[14]	韩红超. 量子粒子群BP神经网络在GNSS高程转换中的应用分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(1): 85-88.
[15]	杨丁亮, 刘志平, 仲崇武. 百度地图坐标解密方法精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(7): 43-47.