亚太区域北斗三号对北斗二号精密单点定位的增强效果分析

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0010

测绘通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 56-60.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0010

亚太区域北斗三号对北斗二号精密单点定位的增强效果分析

马会林¹, 吴文坛², 吴秀丽³

1. 河北省第二测绘院, 河北石家庄 050000;
2. 河北省自然资源档案馆, 河北石家庄 050000;
3. 河北省第三测绘院, 河北石家庄 050000

收稿日期:2021-07-06 发布日期:2022-02-22
作者简介:马会林(1979-),男,高级工程师,主要从事大地测量、工程测绘、不动产测量、地理信息系统工程等测绘高新技术的研究与应用开发。E-mail:11119076@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2016YFB0502105；2016YFB0502101）

Performance analysis of BDS-2 precise point positioning augmented by BDS-3 within the Asia-Pacific region

MA Huilin¹, WU Wentan², WU Xiuli³

1. Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050000, China;
2. Hebei Province Natural Resources Archives, Shijiazhuang 050000, China;
3. Third Surveying and Mapping Institute of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050000, China

Received:2021-07-06 Published:2022-02-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 北斗二号卫星导航系统主要由GEO和IGSO星座卫星构成，其整体星座的几何结构变化缓慢，导致应用于精密单点定位（PPP）时需要较长收敛时间。而北斗三号卫星导航系统的建成将有利于缓解上述问题，获得更优的定位效果。为了探究北斗三号对北斗二号PPP的增强效果，本文选取10个位于亚太区域内的iGMAS测站3 d的观测数据，首先分析3家IGS分析中心对北斗三号卫星精密产品的支持情况；然后分别对静态和模拟动态两种模式的定位性能进行展开分析。结果表明：①亚太区域内北斗三号卫星数量达到9颗。②加入北斗三号卫星后，静态PPP的收敛时间缩短了40%，收敛后的精度提高了46.5%；模拟动态PPP的收敛时间缩短了42.8%，收敛后的精度提高了45.7%。

关键词: 北斗三号, 北斗二号, 亚太区域, 精密单点定位, 定位性能

Abstract: BDS-2 satellite navigation system is mainly composed of GEO and IGSO constellation satellites. The geometric structure of the whole constellation changes slowly, which leads to a long convergence time when it is applied to precise point positioning(PPP). The construction of BDS-3 satellite navigation system will help to alleviate the above problems and obtain better positioning effect. In order to explore the enhancement effect of BDS-3 on BDS-2 PPP, this paper selects the 3 d observation data of 10 iGMAS stations located in the Asia-Pacific region, and first analyzes the support of three IGS analysis centers for BDS-3 precise products. Then, the positioning performance of static mode and simulated kinematic mode is analyzed. The results show that:①There are 9 BDS-3 satellites in the Asia-Pacific region can be observed. ②After applying BDS-3, the convergence time of static PPP is reduced by 40%, and the converged accuracy is improved by 46.5%. The convergence time of simulated dynamic PPP is reduced by 42.8%, and the accuracy is improved by 45.7%.

Key words: BDS-3, BDS-2, the Asia-Pacific region, precise point positioning, positioning performance

中图分类号:

P228

马会林, 吴文坛, 吴秀丽. 亚太区域北斗三号对北斗二号精密单点定位的增强效果分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(1): 56-60.

MA Huilin, WU Wentan, WU Xiuli. Performance analysis of BDS-2 precise point positioning augmented by BDS-3 within the Asia-Pacific region[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(1): 56-60.

参考文献

[1] 郭树人,蔡洪亮,孟轶男,等. 北斗三号导航定位技术体制与服务性能[J].测绘学报,2019,48(7):810-821.
[2] LU M Q, LI W Y, YAO Z, et al. Overview of BDS III new signals[J]. Navigation(Journal of the Institute of Navigation), 2019, 66(1):19-35.
[3] 程军龙,王旺,马立烨,等. 北斗三号观测数据质量及定位精度初步评估[J].测绘通报,2019(8):1-7.
[4] 曾添,贾小林,隋立芬,等. 北斗三号组网卫星数据质量分析及单系统定轨精度初步评估[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2019,39(11):1165-1170.
[5] ZHANG Z T, LI B F, NIE L W, et al. Initial assessment of BeiDou-3 global navigation satellite system:signal quality, RTK and PPP[J]. GPS Solutions, 2019, 23(4):111.
[6] 李涌涛,李建文,潘林,等. 北斗三号新信号B1C和B2a观测数据质量分析评估[J].地球科学进展,2018,33(11):1161-1168.
[7] HOU P Y, ZHANG B C, YUAN Y, et al. Stochastic modeling of BDS-2/3 observations with application to RTD/RTK positioning[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2019, 30(9):095002.
[8] OUYANG C H, SHI J B, SHEN Y R, et al. Six-year BDS-2 broadcast navigation message analysis from 2013 to 2018:availability, anomaly, and SIS UREs assessment[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(12):2767.
[9] SHI J B, OUYANG C H, HUANG Y S, et al. Assessment of BDS-3 global positioning service:ephemeris, SPP, PPP, RTK, and new signal[J]. GPS Solutions, 2020, 24(3):1-14.
[10] 许扬胤,杨元喜,曾安敏,等. 北斗三号全球系统空间信号精度评估分析[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2020,40(10):1000-1006.
[11] 王海春,贾小林,李鼎,等. 北斗三号卫星广播星历精度评估分析[J].导航定位学报,2019,7(4):60-63.
[12] 毛亚,王潜心,胡超,等. BDS-3卫星钟差特性分析[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2020,45(1):53-61.
[13] LI X X, XIE W L, HUANG J X, et al. Estimation and analysis of differential code biases for BDS-3/BDS-2 using iGMAS and MGEX observations[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2019, 93(3):419-435.
[14] ZHAO W, CHEN H, GAO Y, et al. Evaluation of inter-system bias between BDS-2 and BDS-3 satellites and its impact on precise point positioning[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(14):2185.
[15] OUYANG C H, SHI J B, HUANG Y S, et al. Evaluation of BDS-2 real-time orbit and clock corrections from four IGS analysis centers[J].Measurement,2021,168:108441.

亚太区域北斗三号对北斗二号精密单点定位的增强效果分析

Performance analysis of BDS-2 precise point positioning augmented by BDS-3 within the Asia-Pacific region

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈一彪, 秘金钟, 谷守周, 杨李俊, 王洪斌, 楚彬. BDS-3+GPS精密单点定位模型及性能分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(6): 12-17,39.
[2]	罗幼安, 蒋爱国, 杨福鑫, 张洁, 何东旭, 许英龙. BDS精密单点定位在海洋石油钻井平台动力定位系统的应用研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(4): 111-116.
[3]	肖浩威, 王江林, 郭海荣, 杨立扬. PPP-B2b服务的实时精密单点定位精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(4): 117-121.
[4]	周全, 张扬, 李子申, 韩保民, 孟昊, 董孝松, 郭振华. 低轨卫星导航增强星座地基观测仿真系统设计[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(2): 110-115.
[5]	李建刚, 李红慧, 柴祥君, 王天宇. GPS、BDS、GPS+BDS精密单点定位精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(9): 124-129.
[6]	刘生锋, 杨文龙, 谷涛. BDS-3双频组合精密单点定位精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(3): 7-11,17.
[7]	慕仁海, 党亚民, 许长辉. BDS-3新频点单点定位研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(3): 12-17.
[8]	焦博, 郝金明, 时春霖, 刘伟平, 刘婧, 谢建涛. 北斗小数周偏差时变特性分析及应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(1): 66-70.
[9]	李宏达, 张显云, 廖留峰, 李婷, 聂士海. 利用GPS/BDS/GLONASS/Galileo组合PPP反演大气可降水量[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(6): 63-66,98.
[10]	饶鹏文, 毛亚. BDS卫星实时钟差估计[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(5): 69-72,100.
[11]	戴金倩, 吴迪, 戴小蕾, 楼益栋. BDS-3实时精密单点定位精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(1): 30-34.
[12]	谷世铭, 党亚民, 王虎, 谷守周, 许长辉, 任政兆, 张金旭. 北斗天线相位中心偏差改正对精密单点定位的影响[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(1): 66-70.
[13]	张乾坤, 刘小生, 何琦敏. BDS-3多频点伪距单点定位性能研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(1): 71-75.
[14]	程军龙, 王旺, 马立烨, 刘万科. 北斗三号观测数据质量及定位精度初步评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(8): 1-7.
[15]	杨久东, 孔海洋, 侯金亮. GPS/GLONASS精密单点定位加速收敛方法研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(8): 1-5,25.