毛乌素沙地植被水分利用效率时空变化特征及其对水热条件的响应

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2023.0199

测绘通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7): 44-50,79.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2023.0199

毛乌素沙地植被水分利用效率时空变化特征及其对水热条件的响应

杨梅焕¹, 李扬¹, 王涛^1,2, 王钰尧¹, 李奇虎¹, 夏正清³

1. 西安科技大学测绘科学与技术学院, 陕西西安 710054;
2. 西安科技大学国土空间研究所, 陕西西安 710054;
3. 中色蓝图科技股份有限公司, 北京 100012

收稿日期:2022-10-04 出版日期:2023-07-25 发布日期:2023-08-08
通讯作者: 夏正清。E-mail:xzqgis@163.com
作者简介:杨梅焕(1982-),女,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为沙漠化生态过程。E-mail:ymh8307024@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41977059;42171394;41501571);陕西省软科收学研究计划(2022KRM034)

Spatial and temporal change of water use efficiency and its response to air temperature and precipitation in the Mu Us Sandy Land

YANG Meihuan¹, LI Yang¹, WANG Tao^1,2, WANG Yuyao¹, LI Qihu¹, XIA Zhengqing³

1. College of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China;
2. Institute of Territorial Space, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China;
3. ZhongSe-LanTu Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100012, China

Received:2022-10-04 Online:2023-07-25 Published:2023-08-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 水分利用效率(WUE)是研究陆地植被生态系统水-碳循环及其耦合关系的重要指标。本文基于MODIS植被总初级生产力(GPP)和蒸散发(ET)数据产品,利用趋势分析和敏感性分析方法,开展了毛乌素沙地2001—2019年植被WUE时空分布特征及对水热条件响应研究。结果表明:①毛乌素沙地2001—2019年GPP、ET均呈显著的线性增加趋势,而植被WUE呈微弱的线性减少趋势。空间上,毛乌素沙地植被WUE以减少趋势为主,占区域总面积的64.53%,集中分布在中西部和南部地区。②不同植被类型WUE中,林地、灌丛WUE呈线性增加趋势,湿地、农田、草地和荒漠呈线性减少趋势。③毛乌素沙地植被WUE对降水敏感性存在阈值效应,阈值为300 mm,即阈值范围内植被WUE随降水增加而增加,超过阈值后,植被WUE随降水增加而下降。

关键词: 水分利用效率, 植被总初级生产力, 蒸散发, 变化趋势, 毛乌素沙地

Abstract: Water use efficiency (WUE) is an important index to study the coupling relationship between water and carbon cycles in terrestrial ecosystems. Based on MODIS data of gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET), the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of WUE and its response to climate change in the Mu Us Sandy Land from 2001 to 2019 are studied. The results show that: ①GPP and ET in the Mu Us Sandy Land show a significant linear increasing process from 2001 to 2019, while vegetation WUE showes a weak linear decreasing process. Spatially, the WUE of vegetation in Mu Us Sandy Land is dominated by a decreasing trend, accounting for 64.53% of the total area of the region and concentrated in the central and western and southern regions. ②Among the different vegetation types WUE, woodland and scrub WUE show a linear increasing trend, while wetland, farmland, grassland and desert show a linear decreasing trend. ③There is a threshold effect on the sensitivity of vegetation WUE to precipitation in the Mu Us Sandy Land, with a threshold value of 300 mm, i.e. the vegetation WUE increases with precipitation within the threshold value, and decreases with precipitation after the threshold value is exceeded.

Key words: water use efficiency, GPP, ET, change trend, the Mu Us Sandy Land

中图分类号:

P237

杨梅焕, 李扬, 王涛, 王钰尧, 李奇虎, 夏正清. 毛乌素沙地植被水分利用效率时空变化特征及其对水热条件的响应[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 0(7): 44-50,79.

YANG Meihuan, LI Yang, WANG Tao, WANG Yuyao, LI Qihu, XIA Zhengqing. Spatial and temporal change of water use efficiency and its response to air temperature and precipitation in the Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2023, 0(7): 44-50,79.

参考文献

[1] 张继,周旭,蒋啸,等. 贵州高原不同地貌区和植被类型水分利用效率的时空分异特征[J]. 山地学报,2019,37(2):173-185.
[2] 杨昕,王明星. 陆面碳循环研究中若干问题的评述[J]. 地球科学进展,2001,16(3):427-435.
[3] 王永生,李玉恒,刘彦随. 水资源约束下中国沙化土地整治工程与区域农业可持续发展研究:以陕西省榆林市为例[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2020,35(11):1408-1416.
[4] LIU Y,KUMAR M,KATUL G G,et al. Plant hydraulics accentuates the effect of atmospheric moisture stress on transpiration[J].Nature Climate Change,2020,10(7):691-695.
[5] ZHENG H,LIN H,ZHU X J,et al. Divergent spatial responses of plant and ecosystem water-use efficiency to climate and vegetation gradients in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Global and Planetary Change,2019,181:102995.
[6] OLIVERIR G D,BRUNSELL N A,MORAES E C,et al. Evaluation of MODIS-based estimates of water-use efficiency in Amazonia[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2017,38(19):5291-5309.
[7] GANG C,WANG Z,CHEN Y,et al. Drought-induced dynamics of carbon and water use efficiency of global grasslands from 2000 to 2011[J].Ecological Indicators,2016,67:788-797.
[8] 王庆伟,于大炮,代力民,等. 全球气候变化下植物水分利用效率研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报,2010,21(12):3255-3265.
[9] ITO A,INATOMO M. Water-use efficiency of the terrestrial biosphere:a model analysis focusing on interactions between the global carbon and water cycles[J].Journal of Hydrometeorology,2012,13(2):681-694.
[10] LIU Y,XIAO J,JU W,et al. Water use efficiency of China's terrestrial ecosystems and responses to drought[J].Scientific Reports,2015,5(5):13799.
[11] 卢玲,李新,黄春林,等. 中国西部植被水分利用效率的时空特征分析[J]. 冰川冻土,2007,29(5):777-784.
[12] ZHU S,ZHANG C,FANG X,et al. Interactive and individual effects of multi-factor controls on water use efficiency in Central Asian ecosystems[J].Environmental Research Letters,2020,15(8):084025.
[13] HUANG G,LI Y,MU X,et al. Water-use efficiency in response to simulated increasing precipitation in a temperate desert ecosystem of Xinjiang,China[J]. Journal of Arid Land,2017,9(6):823-836.
[14] 李肖娟,张福平,王虎威,等. 黑河流域植被水分利用效率时空变化特征及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 中国沙漠,2017,37(4):733-741.
[15] 付秀东,闫俊杰,沙吾丽·达吾提,等. 伊犁河谷草地生态系统水分利用效率时空变化及影响因素[J]. 水土保持研究,2021,28(1):124-131.
[16] HOU Q,PEI T,YU X,et al. The seasonal response of vegetation water use efficiency to temperature and precipitation in the Loess Plateau,China[J].Global Ecology and Conservation,2022,33:e01984.
[17] 张宝庆,吴普特,赵西宁,等. 黄土高原雨水资源化潜力与时空分布特征[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2013,31(7):636-644.
[18] HUXMAN T E,CABLE J M,IGNACE D D,et al. Response of net ecosystem gas exchange to a simulated precipitation pulse in a semi-arid grassland:the role of native versus non-native grasses and soil texture[J]. Oecologia,2004,141(2):295-305.
[19] 肖笃宁. 生态脆弱区的生态重建与景观规划[J]. 中国沙漠,2003,23(1):6-11.
[20] 毛丽,苏志珠,王国玲,等. 毛乌素沙地不同土地利用类型的土壤粒度及有机质特征[J]. 干旱区研究,2019,36(3):589-598.
[21] YANG S,ZHANG J,ZHANG S,et al. The potential of remote sensing-based models on global water-use efficiency estimation:an evaluation and intercomparison of an ecosystem model (BESS) and algorithm (MODIS) using site level and upscaled eddy covariance data[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2020,287:107959.
[22] PENG H,WANG S,WANG X,et al. Consistency and asymptotic distribution of the Theil-Sen estimator[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference,2007,138(6):1836-1850.
[23] ZHENG H,ZHANG L,ZHU R,et al. Responses of streamflow to climate and land surface change in the headwaters of the Yellow River Basin[J].Water Resources Research,2009,45(7):56-64.
[24] 王姣月,秦树高,张宇清. 毛乌素沙地植被水分利用效率的时空格局[J]. 中国沙漠,2020,40(5):120-129.
[25] SUN H,BAI Y,LU M,et al. Drivers of the water use efficiency changes in China during 1982-2015[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2021,799:149145.
[26] DK A,JB B,MU C,et al. Water use efficiency in terrestrial ecosystem over East Asia:effects of climate regimes and land cover types[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2021,773:145519.
[27] 裴婷婷,李小雁,吴华武,等. 黄土高原植被水分利用效率对气候和植被指数的敏感性研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2019,35(5):119-125.
[28] 郝海超,郝兴明,花顶,等. 2000-2018年中亚五国水分利用效率对气候变化的响应[J]. 干旱区地理,2021,44(1):1-14.
[29] 崔茜琳,何云玲,李宗善. 青藏高原植被水分利用效率时空变化及与气候因子的关系[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(6):1525-1532.

毛乌素沙地植被水分利用效率时空变化特征及其对水热条件的响应

Spatial and temporal change of water use efficiency and its response to air temperature and precipitation in the Mu Us Sandy Land

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张娣, 魏征, 冯天权, 陈祖梅, 王凤静, 黄葵. 灌区蒸散发遥感反演及其时空变化特征分析——以漳河灌区为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(12): 57-63.
[2]	李紫微, 马庆勋, 吕杰. BP神经网络的近地面臭氧估算及时空特征分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(6): 28-32,126.