GF-2支持下的干旱区稀疏植被区植被覆盖度估算

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0214

测绘通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7): 33-38.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0214

GF-2支持下的干旱区稀疏植被区植被覆盖度估算

沈谦¹, 朱长明¹, 张新²

1. 江苏师范大学地理测绘与城乡规划学院, 江苏徐州 221116;
2. 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所遥感科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2018-10-22 出版日期:2019-07-25 发布日期:2019-07-31
通讯作者: 朱长明。E-mail:zhuchangming@jsnu.edu.cn E-mail:zhuchangming@jsnu.edu.cn
作者简介:沈谦(1992-),男,硕士生,主要从事遥感信息智能提取及生态环境遥感等方面研究。E-mail:shenqian_gis@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2017YFB0504201）；国家自然科学基金（41201460）；江苏省研究生创新计划（KYCX17_1691/2）

Fractional vegetation cover estimation in aird and rare vegetation area aided by GF-2 remote sensing data

SHEN Qian¹, ZHU Changming¹, ZHANG Xin²

1. School of Geography, Geomatics and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2018-10-22 Online:2019-07-25 Published:2019-07-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 现有像元二分模型MODIS植被覆盖度模型因其形式简单、适用性较强的特点被广泛应用于区域植被覆盖度（FVC）的估算。然而，研究表明在沙漠和低植被覆盖的西部干旱区，从250 m的影像上很难精准地获取NDVI_veg（全植被覆盖植被指数）和NDVI_soil（全裸土区植被指数）参数。利用常用的直方图累计法获取模型所需参数NDVI_veg和NDVI_soil，估算结果存在普遍高估现象。为此，本文首先引入同期获取的GF-2号卫星数据，从GF-2号影像上提取植被覆盖像元；然后，利用Pixel Aggregate方法重采样至250 m分辨率，获取250 m空间分辨率下纯植被和纯裸土像元；最后，将纯植被和纯裸土像元各自空间位置相对应的MODIS NDVI数据最大值作为模型所需NDVI_veg和NDVI_soil参数，实现研究区内植被覆盖度的估算。试验通过与线性回归法、多项式回归法和直方图累计像元二分模型法估算结果进行精度对比，结果表明：利用GF-2影像辅助的像元二分模型，精准地获取了低植被覆盖区NDVI_veg和NDVI_soil模型参数，提高了干旱区植被覆盖度的估算精度，并有效地抑制了受稀疏植被影响NDVI在干旱区普遍偏高问题导致的FVC高估的现象。

关键词: 高分二号, MODIS NDVI, 像元二分模型, 植被覆盖度

Abstract: The dimidiate pixel model has been widely used in the estimation of fractional vegetation cover because of its simple form and strong applicability. However, studies have shown that selecting parameters in model from 250 m spatial resolution images is very difficult in arid area with low fractional vegetation cover and desert. The estimation result is generally overestimated by using the parameters in model, NDVI_veg and NDVI_soil, acquired by the commonly used histogram accumulation method in the low fractional vegetation cover area with more bare soil and desert. So, this paper firstly used GF-2 high-resolution images of the same time with MODIS to map vegetation cover pixel. Then, Pixel Aggregate method was used to resample vegetation cover map from 0.8 m to 250 m spatial resolution to map pure vegetation cover pixels and pure bare soil pixels with 250 m spatial resolution. The maximum value of MODIS NDVI data corresponding to the spatial position of pure vegetation and pure bare soil pixels was taken as the NDVI_veg and NDVI_soil parameters required by the model to estimate the vegetation cover in the study area to estimate fractional vegetation cover. The estimation accuracy of linear regression method, nonlinear regression method, dimidiate pixel model based on histogram accumulation method to get parameters and based on GF-2 images to get parameters were compared.The results of experiment indicate that dimidiate pixel model based on GF-2 images accurately selected the parameters, NDVI_veg and NDVI_soil, in the low fractional vegetation cover area. This method improves the estimation accuracy of fractional vegetation cover in the arid area, and suppresses the result overestimation in low fractional vegetation cover area due to the effect of the higher NDVI problem in the sparse vegetation area.

Key words: GF-2, MODIS NDVI, dimidiate pixel model, fractional vegetation cover

中图分类号:

P237

沈谦, 朱长明, 张新. GF-2支持下的干旱区稀疏植被区植被覆盖度估算[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(7): 33-38.

SHEN Qian, ZHU Changming, ZHANG Xin. Fractional vegetation cover estimation in aird and rare vegetation area aided by GF-2 remote sensing data[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(7): 33-38.

参考文献

[1] GITELSON A, KAUFMAN Y J, STARK R, et al. Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 80(1):76-87.
[2] 杨林山,李常斌,王帅兵,等. 气候变化和人类活动对洮河流域植被动态的影响研究[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(9):1941-1948.
[3] 贾坤,姚云军,魏香琴,等. 植被覆盖度遥感估算研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(7):774-782.
[4] ZHANG Xianfeng, LIAO Chunhua, LI J, et al. Fractional vegetation cover estimation in arid and semi-arid environments using HJ-1 satellite hyperspectral data[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2013, 21(1):506-512.
[5] 梁顺林,李小文,王锦地. 定量遥感[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2013:389-395.
[6] XIAO J, MOODY A. A comparison of methods for estimating fractional green vegetation cover within a desert-to-upland transition zone in central New Mexico, USA[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 98(2-3):237-250.
[7] BOYD D S, FOODY G M, RIPPLE W J. Evaluation of approaches for forest cover estimation in the Pacific Northwest, USA, using remote sensing[J]. Applied Geography, 2002, 22(4):375-392.
[8] CARLSON T N, RIPLEY D A. On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index.[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1997, 62(3):241-252.
[9] 李苗苗,吴炳方,颜长珍,等. 密云水库上游植被覆盖度的遥感估算[J]. 资源科学, 2004, 26(4):153-159.
[10] 刘宪锋,任志远,林志慧,等. 2000-2011年三江源区植被覆盖时空变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(7):897-908.
[11] 穆少杰,李建龙,陈奕兆,等. 2001-2010年内蒙古植被覆盖度时空变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9):1255-1268.
[12] 李丽丽,王大为,韩涛. 2000-2015年石羊河流域植被覆盖度及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(5):1108-1118.
[13] LU D, WENG Q. Spectral mixture analysis of the urban landscape in Indianapolis City with Landsat ETM+imagery[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2004, 70(9):1053-1062.
[14] 陈晋,陈云浩,何春阳,等. 基于土地覆盖分类的植被覆盖率估算亚像元模型与应用[J]. 遥感学报, 2001, 5(6):416-422.
[15] 廖清飞,张鑫,马全,等. 青海省东部农业区植被覆盖时空演变遥感监测与分析[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(20):5936-5943.
[16] 汪桂生,仇凯健. 利用MODIS NDVI进行淮南矿区植被覆盖度动态监测[J]. 测绘通报, 2018(6):34-40.
[17] 杨苏新,林卉,侯飞,等. 利用高光谱混合像元分解估测喀斯特地区植被覆盖度[J]. 测绘通报, 2014(5):23-27.
[18] 朱长明,张新,李均力,等. 生态调水前后塔河下游湿地时空变化监测[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(2):420-425.
[19] 吐尔逊·哈斯木,石丽,韩桂红,等. 塔里木河下游植被和沙漠化对输水前后地下水变化的响应分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(6):1033-1038.
[20] 陈亚宁,叶朝霞,毛晓辉,等. 新疆塔里木河断流趋势分析与减缓对策[J]. 干旱区地理, 2009, 32(6):813-820.

GF-2支持下的干旱区稀疏植被区植被覆盖度估算

Fractional vegetation cover estimation in aird and rare vegetation area aided by GF-2 remote sensing data

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵侃, 师芸, 牛敏杰. Google Earth Engine平台下秦岭地区植被覆盖时空变化分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(5): 49-55.
[2]	柳絮, 张宁, 徐晓天, 安超, 许士翔, 李程. 基于多源空间数据与空地协同的植被覆盖度估算——以东亚干草草原为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(1): 39-43,55.
[3]	陈磊士, 高霞霞, 廖玉芳, 邓剑波, 周碧. 基于CART决策树的高分二号洞庭湖区湿地分类方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(6): 12-15.
[4]	王树祥, 韩留生, 杨骥, 李勇, 赵倩, 刘杨晓月, 吴昊. 一种改进的融合多指标荒漠化等级分类方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(4): 8-12.
[5]	李广超, 赵海盟, 伍毅, 杨彬, 李丽和, 张洪, 杨泉光, 陈伟. 2000-2016年广西防城金花茶自然保护区关键生态环境参数时空变化[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(2): 13-17.
[6]	陈伟, 王哲, 赵海盟, 李丽和, 张学鹏, 李广超. 利用线性融合方法进行金花茶自然保护区植被覆盖度时空变化研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(11): 1-6.
[7]	石振武, 李驰. 黑龙江省呼玛至十八站公路路域生存环境质量评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(11): 106-109,114.
[8]	胡洁, 姜成桢, 杨勇, 何晓锋, 李凯. 黑河中下游植被覆盖度变化遥感监测[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(10): 34-38.
[9]	王科雯, 李晶, 王瑞国, 付晓. 胜利矿区植被覆盖度时序变化的空间异质性监测[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(11): 1-6.
[10]	李晶, 崔绿园, 闫萧萧, 杨震, 董金玮, 邓晓娟. 草原矿区长时序植被覆盖度变化趋势对比分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(8): 130-134,157.
[11]	王芳, 杨武年, 王建, 谢兵, 杨鑫, 任金铜. GF-2影像城市地物分类方法探讨[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(7): 12-16.
[12]	张宇航, 杨武年, 任金铜, 邓晓宇. 高分二号卫星影像自适应模糊阈值法小波去噪[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(3): 32-35.
[13]	贺秋华, 邹娟, 余姝辰, 李长安, 余德清. 基于高分二号数据的湖南省十大水库网箱围栏养殖分布遥感调查[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(10): 8-11,159.
[14]	董显聪, 李晓洁. 草原植被覆盖度遥感估算模型的适用性比较[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(10): 17-22.
[15]	胡云锋, 张千力. 结合形态学和光谱特征参数的建筑物阴影提取及其高度估算[J]. 测绘通报, 2018, 0(6): 22-26.