对比传统低空航测的无人机倾斜摄影测量精度评估

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0039

测绘通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 31-36.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0039

对比传统低空航测的无人机倾斜摄影测量精度评估

蔡嘉伦¹, 贾洪果^1,2, 刘国祥^1,2, 张波¹, 刘巧³, 吴仁哲¹, 向卫¹, 毛文飞¹, 张瑞^1,2

1. 西南交通大学地球科学与环境工程学院, 四川成都 611756;
2. 高速铁路运营安全空间信息技术国家地方联合工程试验室, 四川成都 611756;
3. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2021-03-08 修回日期:2021-05-17 发布日期:2022-03-11
通讯作者: 贾洪果。E-mail:rsjia@swjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:蔡嘉伦(1991-),男,博士生,主要研究方向为地质灾害监测与环境遥感。E-mail:caijialun@my.swjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41771402；41701535；41871069）；国家重点研发计划（2017YFB0502700）；高分辨率对地观测重大专项航空观测系统项目（30-H30C01-9004-19/21）；四川省科技计划（2019YJ0224；2019ZDZX0042；2020JDTD0003；2020YJ0322）

Accuracy evaluation of UAV tilt photogrammetry compared with traditional low altitude aerial photogrammetry

CAI Jialun¹, JIA Hongguo^1,2, LIU Guoxiang^1,2, ZHANG Bo¹, LIU Qiao³, WU Renzhe¹, XIANG Wei¹, MAO Wenfei¹, ZHANG Rui^1,2

1. Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China;
2. State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Spatial Information Technology of High-Speed Rail Safety, Chengdu 611756, China;
3. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2021-03-08 Revised:2021-05-17 Published:2022-03-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国内倾斜摄影测量技术目前仍处于快速发展的推广阶段，其成果精度高度依赖于航测生产全流程中各航测参数的选取，很难实现对其绝对精度的定量分析。针对这一难点，本文采用对比分析的方式，以传统低空航测为参照，在严格统一外部数据采集条件、解算参数的基础上对无人机倾斜摄影测量进行精度评估与分析，探索无人机倾斜摄影测量的突出技术优势。试验共涉及12种主流航测模式及52种地面控制点，采用递进布设方式对比分析其成果精度，并完成了倾斜摄影测量对比传统低空航测的量化分析。本文可为倾斜摄影测量精度评估提供一定的参考，具有较好的工程实践指导意义。

关键词: 无人机航测, 倾斜摄影测量, 空中三角测量, 对比分析, 精度评估

Abstract: At present, the domestic tilt photogrammetry technology is still in the stage of rapid development and promotion, and its accuracy highly depends on the selection of aerial survey parameters in the whole process of aerial survey production, so it is difficult to realize the quantitative analysis of its absolute accuracy index. In view of this difficulty, this paper adopts the way of comparative analysis taking the traditional low altitude aerial survey as the reference, on the basis of strictly unified the external data acquisition conditions and solving parameters, evaluates and analyzes the accuracy of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) tilt photogrammetry, and explores the outstanding technical advantages of UAV tilt photogrammetry. The experiment involves 12 kinds of mainstream aerial survey modes and 52 kinds of progressive layout of ground control points in order to compare and analyze the accuracy index of the results, and complete the quantitative analysis of tilt photogrammetry compared with traditional low altitude aerial survey. This study can provide certain reference and practical guidance for the accuracy evaluation of tilt photogrammetry.

Key words: UAV aerial photogrammetry, tilt photogrammetry, aerotriangulation, comparative analysis, accuracy evaluation

中图分类号:

P237

蔡嘉伦, 贾洪果, 刘国祥, 张波, 刘巧, 吴仁哲, 向卫, 毛文飞, 张瑞. 对比传统低空航测的无人机倾斜摄影测量精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(2): 31-36.

CAI Jialun, JIA Hongguo, LIU Guoxiang, ZHANG Bo, LIU Qiao, WU Renzhe, XIANG Wei, MAO Wenfei, ZHANG Rui. Accuracy evaluation of UAV tilt photogrammetry compared with traditional low altitude aerial photogrammetry[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 0(2): 31-36.

参考文献

[1] 李德仁,李明.无人机遥感系统的研究进展与应用前景[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014, 39(5):505-513, 540.
[2] JULGE K, ELLMANN A, KÖÖK R. Unmanned aerial vehicle surveying for monitoring road construction earthworks[J]. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 2019, 14(1):1-17.
[3] HE Xiaoyuan, YANG Xingke, LUO Zheng, et al. Application of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) thermal infrared remote sensing to identify coal fires in the Huojitu coal mine in Shenmu city, China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10:13895.
[4] 王建梅,朱紫阳.利用已有像控点的多期航空影像光束法区域网联合平差[J].测绘学报, 2010, 39(1):22-27.
[5] VARBLA S, PUUST R, ELLMANN A. Accuracy assessment of RTK-GNSS equipped UAV conducted as-built surveys for construction site modelling[J]. Survey Review, 2020:1-16.
[6] 姜丙波,查海林,苏军明,等.高精度POS在无人机航摄大比例尺测图中的应用[J].测绘通报, 2017(S1):30-32, 45.
[7] COLOMINA I, MOLINA P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing:a review[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014, 92:79-97.
[8] NESBIT P, HUGENHOLTZ C. Enhancing UAV-SfM 3D model accuracy in high-relief landscapes by incorporating oblique images[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(3):239.
[9] HARWIN S, LUCIEER A. Assessing the accuracy of georeferenced point clouds produced via multi-view stereopsis from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery[J]. Remote Sensing, 2012, 4(6):1573-1599.
[10] 李德仁,肖雄武,郭丙轩,等.倾斜影像自动空三及其在城市真三维模型重建中的应用[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2016, 41(6):711-721.
[11] GOMES PESSOA G, CACERES CARRILHO A, TAKAHASHI MIYOSHI G, et al. Assessment of UAV-based digital surface model and the effects of quantity and distribution of ground control points[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2021, 42(1):65-83.
[12] MARTÍNEZ-CARRICONDO P, AGÜERA-VEGA F, CARVAJAL-RAMÍREZ F, et al. Assessment of UAV-photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation of ground control points[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2018, 72:1-10.
[13] 国家测绘局.低空数字航空摄影测量外业规范:CH/Z 3004-2010[S].北京:测绘出版社, 2010.
[14] 张春森,朱师欢,臧玉府,等.顾及曝光延迟的无人机GPS辅助光束法平差方法[J].测绘学报, 2017, 46(5):565-572.
[15] 陈良浩,朱彩英,徐青,等.无人机航测水域控制点布设方案的精度试验[J].测绘科学, 2016, 41(7):205-210.
[16] 朱进,丁亚洲,陈攀杰,等.控制点布设对无人机影像空三精度的影响[J].测绘科学, 2016, 41(5):116-120.
[17] PADRÓ J C, MUÑOZ F J, PLANAS J, et al. Comparison of four UAV georeferencing methods for environmental monitoring purposes focusing on the combined use with airborne and satellite remote sensing platforms[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2019, 75:130-140.
[18] 闫利,费亮,叶志云,等.大范围倾斜多视影像连接点自动提取的区域网平差法[J].测绘学报, 2016, 45(3):310-317, 338.
[19] EKASO D, NEX F, KERLE N. Accuracy assessment of real-time kinematics (RTK) measurements on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for direct geo-referencing[J]. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 2020, 23(2):165-181.
[20] FORLANI G, DALL'ASTA E, DIOTRI F, et al. Quality assessment of DSMs produced from UAV flights georeferenced with on-board RTK positioning[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(2):311.

对比传统低空航测的无人机倾斜摄影测量精度评估

Accuracy evaluation of UAV tilt photogrammetry compared with traditional low altitude aerial photogrammetry

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	兰峰, 张帆, 高云龙, 黄先锋. 顾及地物类别的倾斜摄影三维模型简化方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(4): 44-50.
[2]	任旭斌, 康建锋, 于东海. 无人机倾斜摄影测量在房屋建筑面积测算中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(3): 116-120,126.
[3]	张可, 王永波, 袁坤, 仇春平. 基于附加参数模型的自检校光束法区域网平差算法运行结果对比[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(2): 67-72.
[4]	刘家龙, 贾小林, 陶清瑞, 伏军胜, 张奋. 多系统广播电离层模型精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(1): 66-71,78.
[5]	周阳阳, 徐尚昭, 陈斌, 张青峰. 无人机倾斜摄影测量技术应用于自然保护区勘界[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(9): 43-48.
[6]	赵之星, 鲁小红, 田昕, 刘志奇. 倾斜影像重叠度计算模型及应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(9): 89-92.
[7]	王德强, 赵德良. 高光谱遥感异常目标探测方法性能对比分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(9): 108-111.
[8]	刘宝华, 王智, 宋云记. 三维激光点云和无人机倾斜模型的融合应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(6): 159-162,165.
[9]	杨瑞芳, 尹思阳. 全球热带森林分布区NPP变化及其气候响应分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(5): 49-53,110.
[10]	杨彦梅, 王莹, 施磊, 陶思蓉, 李宏. 基于DP-Modeler的精细化三维模型构建[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(5): 106-110.
[11]	何志敏, 许军. 大亚湾水域水位控制实施与精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(5): 137-139.
[12]	崔庆宏. 精细化建模在特大桥维护检测中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(5): 162-166.
[13]	孙松梅, 黄天进, 孙颖. 城市高精度实景三维单体模型建设及应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(1): 108-111.
[14]	冯增文, 李珂, 李梓豪, 任传斌. 低空无人机的倾斜摄影测量技术在城市轨道交通建设中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(9): 42-45.
[15]	王文凯, 黄昆学, 李梦, 王业明. 倾斜摄影测量数据轻量化处理技术研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2020, 0(9): 123-126.