U-Net模型对不同空间分辨率防护林提取精度的影响

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2021.0173

测绘通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 39-43.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2021.0173

U-Net模型对不同空间分辨率防护林提取精度的影响

王学文^1,2, 赵庆展^1,2, 田文忠^2,3, 龙翔^2,3, 江萍^2,3

1. 石河子大学信息科学与技术学院, 新疆石河子 832000;
2. 兵团空间信息工程技术研究中心, 新疆石河子 832000;
3. 石河子大学机械电气工程学院, 新疆石河子 832000

收稿日期:2020-11-17 发布日期:2021-06-28
通讯作者: 赵庆展。E-mail:zqz_inf@shzu.edu.cn
作者简介:王学文(1996—),男,硕士,主要从事农业信息化技术及应用研究。E-mail:wangxuewen@stu.shzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
新疆生产建设兵团科技计划（2017DB005）；兵团空间信息工程技术研究中心创建项目（2016BA001）；中央引导地方科技发展专项资金项目（201610011）

Influence of U-Net model on the accuracy of shelter forest extraction with different spatial resolutions

WANG Xuewen^1,2, ZHAO Qingzhan^1,2, TIAN Wenzhong^2,3, LONG Xiang^2,3, JIANG Ping^2,3

1. College of Information Science & Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China;
2. Geospatial Information Engineering Research Center, Xinjiang Construction Corps, Shihezi 832000, China;
3. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China

Received:2020-11-17 Published:2021-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对当前无人机影像获取精度高但数据规模小的问题，本文提出通过U-Net模型探讨不同空间分辨率对防护林提取精度的影响。以CW-20复合翼无人机搭载Micro MAC12 Snap多光谱传感器获取的300 m（空间分辨率0.15 m）、400 m（空间分辨率0.20 m）、500 m（空间分辨率0.25 m）3种不同高度的遥感影像为例，试验结果证明，3种不同高度的影像提取精度误差在1.3%以内；MIoU误差在3.7%以内。空间分辨率对防护林提取精度的影响较小，高空间分辨率的影像数据并不能显著提升防护林的提取精度。本文为大规模农林业遥感监测的数据源获取提供了理论依据。

关键词: 无人机, 多光谱影像, 空间分辨率, 防护林提取, U-Net模型

Abstract: Aiming at the problem of high-accuracy of UAV image acquisition but small data scale, this paper proposes to use U-Net model to explore the influence of different spatial resolution on the extraction accuracy of farmland shelterbelts. Take the CW-20 compound-wing UAV equipped with Micro MAC12 Snap multispectral sensor obtained three different height of 300 m(spatial resolution 0.15 m), 400 m(spatial resolution 0.20 m) and 500 m(spatial resolution 0.25 m) as an example. For remote sensing images, experiments results have shown that the accuracy error of image extraction at three different height is within 1.3%, and the accuracy error of MIoU is within 3.7%. The spatial resolution had little effect on the extraction accuracy of shelterbelts. The image data with high spatial resolution can not significantly improve the extraction accuracy of shelterbelts. This study provides a theoretical basis for the acquisition of large-scale agricultural and forestry remote sensing monitoring data sources.

Key words: UAV, multi-spectral image, spatial resolution, shelterbelts extraction, U-Net model

中图分类号:

P237

王学文, 赵庆展, 田文忠, 龙翔, 江萍. U-Net模型对不同空间分辨率防护林提取精度的影响[J]. 测绘通报, 2021, 0(6): 39-43.

WANG Xuewen, ZHAO Qingzhan, TIAN Wenzhong, LONG Xiang, JIANG Ping. Influence of U-Net model on the accuracy of shelter forest extraction with different spatial resolutions[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 0(6): 39-43.

参考文献

[1] HU Y F, ZHANG Q L, ZHANG Y, et al. A deep convolu-tion neural network method for land cover mapping: a case study of Qinhuangdao, China[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(12):2053.
[2] 张磊,宫兆宁,王启为,等.Sentinel-2影像多特征优选的黄河三角洲湿地信息提取[J].遥感学报,2019,23(2):313-326.
[3] DASH J P, WATT M S, PEARSE G D, et al. Assessing very high resolution UAV imagery for monitoring forest health during a simulated disease outbreak[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2017, 131:1-14.
[4] DENG L, MAO Z H, LI X J, et al. UAV-based multi-spectral remote sensing for precision agriculture: a comparison between different cameras[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2018, 146:124-136.
[5] 戴建国,张国顺,郭鹏,等. 基于无人机遥感可见光影像的北疆主要农作物分类方法[J]. 农业工程学报,2018,34(18):122-129.
[6] TU Y H, JOHANSEN K, PHINN S, et al. Measuring canopy structure and condition using multi-spectral UAS imagery in a horticultural environment[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(3):269.
[7] 刘舒,朱航. 基于超高空间分辩率无人机影像的面向对象土地利用分类方法[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(2):87-94.
[8] FISHER J R B, PORRAS E A A, DENNEDY-FRANK P J, et al. Impact of satellite imagery spatial resolution on land use classification accuracy and modeled water quality[J].Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 2017,4(2):137-149.
[9] LI N, XIE G D, ZHOU D M, et al. Remote sensing classification of marsh wetland with different resolution images[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2016, 7(2):107-114.
[10] YE H C, HUANG W J, HUANG S Y, et al. Recognition of banana fusarium wilt based on UAV remote sensing[J].Remote Sensing, 2020,12(6):938.
[11] 邱琳,卢必慧,孙玲,等.GF-1卫星影像的空间分辨率对水稻识别精度的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,35(1):70-75.
[12] 刘婷,陈晨,范文义,等.基于不同空间尺度遥感影像估算森林叶面积指数的差异[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(5):1687-1698.
[13] RONNEBERGER O, FISCHER P, BROX T. U-Net: convo-lutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[J]. Computer Vision and Pattern Recongnition, 2015: 1505.04597.
[14] MAGGIORI E,TARABALKA Y, CHARPIAT G, et al. Fully convolutional neural networks for remote sensing image classification[C]// IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Beijing: IEEE, 2016.
[15] 许慧敏. 基于深度学习U-Net模型的高分辨率遥感影像分类方法研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2018.
[16] 周志华.机器学习[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2016.
[17] HAMDI Z M, BRANDMEIER M, STRAUB C. Forest damage assessment using deep learning on high resolution remote sensing data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019,11(17):1976.

U-Net模型对不同空间分辨率防护林提取精度的影响

Influence of U-Net model on the accuracy of shelter forest extraction with different spatial resolutions

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡义强, 杨骥, 荆文龙, 彭小燕, 蓝文陆, 彭梦微, 张雨萌. 茅尾海入海河口池塘养殖污染状况遥感调查[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 12-17,53.
[2]	冉崇宪, 李森磊. 利用无人机多光谱影像提取树冠信息[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 112-117.
[3]	刘玉贤, 阮明浩, 闫臻. 一种基于机载激光点云的门型电塔精确提取方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 129-133.
[4]	周烨, 刘云波, 郑丽波, 龙泱君. 多平台点云数据的单木参数提取精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 168-172.
[5]	胡义强, 杨骥, 荆文龙, 杨传训, 舒思京, 李勇. 基于无人机遥感的海岸带生态环境监测研究综述[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(6): 18-24.
[6]	周建国, 罗超, 彭朵. 微型无人机辅助的三角高程测量方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(6): 71-75.
[7]	刘耀辉, 于祥惠, 范洁洁, 周洁, 程昊, 姚国标, 孟飞, 靳奉祥. 基于无人机影像和面向对象的中国西部地区农村宅基地面积快速估算[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(6): 125-129.
[8]	万忠明, 王亚文, 范子义. 无人机倾斜摄影技术在边坡监测中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(6): 170-172.
[9]	王广帅. 无人机倾斜摄影铁路轨道线高精度自动重建[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(5): 133-139,156.
[10]	毕瑞, 甘淑, 袁希平, 李绕波, 高莎. 不同地形环境下无人机航线规划及三维建模分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(4): 83-89,129.
[11]	任旭斌, 康建锋, 于东海. 无人机倾斜摄影测量在房屋建筑面积测算中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(3): 116-120,126.
[12]	蔡嘉伦, 贾洪果, 刘国祥, 张波, 刘巧, 吴仁哲, 向卫, 毛文飞, 张瑞. 对比传统低空航测的无人机倾斜摄影测量精度评估[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(2): 31-36.
[13]	贾煜, 汪泓, 蔡宏, 张磊. 结合地形因子与分层策略的喀斯特地区无人机影像分类[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(2): 121-127.
[14]	范媛, 范宏, 吴建国, 林峻, 陈吉军, 巴日斯, 郑江华. 无人机影像识别白喉乌头的相对高程阈值法适用性分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(2): 131-135.
[15]	宁婷, 崔伟, 马晓勇. 基于均值变点法提取地形起伏度的影响因素分析——以黄河流域(山西段)为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(2): 159-163.