融合GPS与强震仪数据实时监测瞬时地壳形变

doi:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0392

测绘通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (12): 87-90,115.doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2019.0392

融合GPS与强震仪数据实时监测瞬时地壳形变

陈向阳¹, 于金池², 葛建¹, 侯勇涛³

1. 南通职业大学建筑工程学院, 江苏南通 226007;
2. 南通大学交通与土木学院, 江苏南通 226019;
3. 上海华测导航技术股份有限公司, 上海 201702

收稿日期:2019-05-05 发布日期:2020-01-03
作者简介:陈向阳(1975-),男,硕士,讲师,主要从事测量工程、GNSS应用、变形监测及数据处理等方面的研究。E-mail:470306595@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41274017）；2017年度南通市市级科技计划（yyz17101）；2017年度南通市市级科技计划（MS12017027-3）

Real-time monitoring of instantaneous crustal deformation by integrating GPS and strong seismometer data

CHEN Xiangyang¹, YU Jinchi², GE Jian¹, HOU Yongtao³

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nantong Vocational University, Nantong 226007, China;
2. School of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China;
3. Shanghai China Navigation Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201702, China

Received:2019-05-05 Published:2020-01-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对强震仪与GPS各自的优点与缺陷，以2016年意大利Mw 6.0级地震为例，探讨了利用Kalman滤波融合GPS与强震仪数据实时监测中等强度地震引起的瞬时地壳形变的可行性与优势。Kalman滤波获取的位移波形以GPS数据作为整体趋势，细节部分用强震仪数据进行描述，融合后的位移波形精度较高，能够准确和细致地描述地震引起的地表动态形变；与此同时，Kalman滤波位移波形也能够准确地探测中等强度地震引起的同震永久阶跃；Kalman滤波位移波形的功率谱在低频部分与GPS位移波形的功率谱密度相似，在高频部分与强震仪位移波形的功率谱密度相似，表明Kalman滤波结合了GPS与强震仪各自的优点；交叉小波分析表明，Kalman滤波获取的位移波形与GPS、强震仪数据呈现较强的正相关性，小波相似值均在0.8以上。以上结果表明，融合GPS与强震仪数据可以结合二者各自的优点，弥补各自的缺陷；融合GPS与强震仪数据可以有效探测中等强度地震引起的瞬时地壳形变。

关键词: GPS, 强震仪, Kalman滤波, 融合, 地壳形变

Abstract: In view of the merits and drawbacks of strong motion (SM) and GPS, taking the Mw 6.0 Italy earthquake as a subject, the feasibility of Kalman filter to combine GPS and SM data, and then to conduct the real-time monitoring of instantaneous crustal deformation caused by moderate earthquake using fusion is discussed. The displacement waveform obtained by Kalman filtering uses GPS data as the overall trend, and the details are described by the SM displacement data. The combined displacement waveform has higher precision and can accurately and meticulously describe the coseismic ground dynamic deformation caused by earthquakes. At the same time, the Kalman filter displacement waveform can accurately detect the coseismic permanent offsets caused by moderate earthquake. The power spectrum density (PSD) of combined displacement waveform is similar to that of GPS displacement waveform in the low-frequency regions, while it is similar to the PSD of SM displacement waveform in the high-frequency regions, indicating that Kalman filtering can combine the advantages of GPS and SM. The spectral index of the displacement waveform obtained by Kalman filtering is different from that of GPS and SM displacement waveforms, indicating that the fused displacement waveform can better describe the variation of the noise characteristics of displacement waveform data caused by the earthquake. Cross-wavelet analysis shows that the displacement waveform obtained by Kalman filter has strong positive correlation with GPS and SM data, and the cross wavelet semblance is above 0.8. The above results show that the combined displacement waveform can combine the advantages of GPS and SM to make up for their defects. The combination of GPS and SM can effectively detect the transient crustal deformation induced by the earthquake with moderate magnitude.

Key words: GPS, strong motion instrument, Kalman filtering, fusion, crustal deformation

中图分类号:

P228

陈向阳, 于金池, 葛建, 侯勇涛. 融合GPS与强震仪数据实时监测瞬时地壳形变[J]. 测绘通报, 2019, 0(12): 87-90,115.

CHEN Xiangyang, YU Jinchi, GE Jian, HOU Yongtao. Real-time monitoring of instantaneous crustal deformation by integrating GPS and strong seismometer data[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2019, 0(12): 87-90,115.

参考文献

[1] 邱亚辉, 薄志毅, 郎博. 环渤海地区GPS台站时间序列分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2018(6):17-21.
[2] LARSON K M, POLAN M, MIKLIUS A. Volcano monitoring using volcano intrusion and eruption[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2010, 115:B07406. DOI:10.1029/2009JB007022.
[3] 陈明东. GPS/PWV在台风"玛莉亚"袭闽期间的变化特征研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2019(1):93-96.
[4] 丰秋林, 郑南山. 机器学习算法辅助的GPS信噪比观测值土壤湿度反演[J]. 测绘通报, 2018(7):106-111.
[5] 毛亚, 王潜心, 胡超, 等. EEMD分解的超快速北斗卫星钟差预报[J]. 测绘通报, 2018(5):20-24.
[6] SEGALL T. Earthquake and volcano deformation[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
[7] BLEWITT G, KREEMER C, HAMMOND W C, et al. Rapid determination of earthquake magnitude using GPS for tsunami warning systems[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, 33(11): 1-4.
[8] LARSON K. GPS seismology[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2009, 83(3): 227-233.
[9] KOUBA J. Measure seismic waves induced by large earthquakes with GPS[J]. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2003, 47(4): 741-755.
[10] SHI C, LOU Y, ZHANG H, et al. Seismic deformation of the Mw 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake from high-rate GPS observations[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2010, 46(2): 228-235.
[11] GUO J, YUAN Y, KONG Q, et al. Deformation caused by the 2011 eastern Japan great earthquake monitored using the GPS single-epoch precise point position technique[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2012, 9(4): 483-493.
[12] NISHIMURA T, TETSURO I, HIROSHI Y. A preliminary fault model of the 2003 July 26, M6.4 northern Miyagi earthquake, northeastern Japan, estimated from joint inversion of GPS, leveling, and InSAR data[J]. Earth Planets Space, 2003, 55(12): 751-757.
[13] WANG Y, ZHU J, OU Z. Coseismic slip distribution of 2009 L’Aquila earthquake derived from InSAR and GPS data[J]. Journal of Central south University, 2012, 19(5): 244-251.
[14] BOCK Y, MELGAR D, CROWELL B W. Real-time strong-motion broadband displacements from collocated GPS and accelerometers[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2011, 101(6):2904-2925.
[15] GRINSTED A, MOORE J, JEVREJEVA S. Application of the cross wavelet tranform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series[J]. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 2004, 11(5): 561-56

融合GPS与强震仪数据实时监测瞬时地壳形变

Real-time monitoring of instantaneous crustal deformation by integrating GPS and strong seismometer data

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	岳胜杰, 王红旗, 刘群坡, 赵荣亮. 结合扩展卡尔曼滤波与基于点线的最近点迭代扫描匹配算法的机器人位姿自适应估计[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 49-53.
[2]	贾秀丽. 高斯过程回归辅助下的GPS干涉反射积雪深度估测[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 78-82.
[3]	刘立, 董先敏, 刘娟, 文学虎. 人机融合智能的遥感解译生产新方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 118-123,137.
[4]	黄良珂, 王式太, 周吕, 付波霖, 陆琴, 刘立龙, 李景文, 姜建武, 黄军胜. 多平台融合的测绘类专业学生创新能力培养[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(7): 163-167.
[5]	陈一彪, 秘金钟, 谷守周, 杨李俊, 王洪斌, 楚彬. BDS-3+GPS精密单点定位模型及性能分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(6): 12-17,39.
[6]	谢洪, 陈立波, 聂倩, 吴玮, 张沛. 利用点云配准的空地影像融合技术[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(6): 82-87.
[7]	刘春杉, 曾元武, 罗宏明, 程迎轩, 钟小君, 张彤辉, 岳文. 广东省国土空间规划"一张图"实施监督信息系统下的海洋数据融合研究与实践[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(6): 154-157.
[8]	韩世静, 苗书锋, 郝向阳, 陈润泽. 监控视频与地理信息融合技术发展综述[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(5): 1-6.
[9]	陈兰兰, 夏益强, 肖海平, 刘小生. 露天矿边坡稳定性监测方法研究现状及进展[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(5): 7-13.
[10]	文奴, 郭仁忠, 贺彪, 万远. YOLO v4框架下Multi-Patch多帧增量式交通视频目标检测[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(5): 38-44.
[11]	阮明浩, 卢永华, 刘玉贤, 汤圣君, 王伟玺, 张宇琦, 李游. 激光与倾斜点云精确配准与无缝融合[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(4): 6-10.
[12]	刘小玉, 刘扬, 杜明义, 张敏, 贾竞珏, 杨恒. 基于DeeplabV3+的建筑垃圾堆放点识别[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(4): 16-19,43.
[13]	窦世卿, 陈治宇, 徐勇, 郑贺刚, 苗林林, 宋莹莹. 基于多特征融合与典型降维方法的高光谱影像分类[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(4): 32-36,50.
[14]	万应能, 徐雪寒, 刘科显. 多关节深海航行器组合导航算法[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(4): 90-95.
[15]	高志钰, 郭进义, 刘杰. 北斗在地壳形变监测中的应用进展[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 0(3): 32-35.